sculper

Weird, because I remember you claiming that it was a moral imperative to lick the government's boot a few months ago:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46747587

Has anything changed your mind since then?

Worth noting that the commenter you're replying to is only LARPing as a centrist. The comment history of his other (now-banned) accounts are directly at odds with some of the "truths" he claims to have realized.

https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=complianceowl

https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=owlcompliance

If you're truly curious:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_asking_questions

But judging by your other recent comments, I suspect that you are not asking this question in good faith.

If this were the HN of ten years ago, I might have expressed similar sentiments.

Between the comments in this thread though, and the complete lack of moderator attention, I can only come to the conclusion that xenophobia is perfectly fine on HN - provided you couch it in the appropriate rhetoric and don't use any mean words.

For someone who constantly whines about political advocacy on HN, you sure do engage in a lot of political advocacy on HN.

I've suspected that Rayiner's posts were held to a different standard of moderation than others for _quite_ some time. Thank you for explicitly confirming this.

> The conservatives have made it clear that they support the rule, but it needs to be done right.

They have _said_ that they support the rule. In recent years, conservative judges have said a number of things that don't hold up to any amount of scrutiny.

The current administration explicitly condones violence against political rivals. "They" seems fair.

This is an absolutely _wild_ take. What "leftist" positions are you referring to? Be specific.

> The company wants to make debt collection, if not kinder or gentler, then certainly more efficient.

Yikes.

How do you think he is violating the law?

He's storing email addresses that have already been leaked, and providing a free service for those who are concerned they may have been compromised.