savingsPossible
savingsPossible on Hacker News
Got a citation/link?
Disagree that this means the probabilistic signal is negative. They did become especially capable psychos.
At least according to phind
https://www.phind.com/search/cmg40zr9i00002a6lqddmuyxt
I suppose that would count as a progressive tax (as opposed to regressive, like VAT)
Searches understandably are finding more 'ordinary/necessary' expenses for business than for families
* giving you a no-shame route up and down so that you can choose your own level of challenge, which entails
* giving you opportunities to try the more gifted programs to see if you'd do well and enjoy them
and also
* giving you the opportunity to choose a less demanding program in which you can find and adequate level of challenge (if you need to)
BUT
* treating disruptive behaviour as a choice to go to a less demanding program
ALSO: thinking means changing your mind, which often exposes you to being called a hypocrite
Or even: 'the wisest sages know that incorrect results can be based on some sound thinking and some muddled thinking, and correct results can be derived by tortuous thinking'
Or maybe: 'the wisest sages know that some things are neither objectively true nor objectively false, and can appreciate good arguments for positions they disagree with'
I wonder what that confidence score means... If it is 90% probability, then we'd expect it to be wrong 10% of the time
The land literally heals when 'the rightful king' is back in power
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amish
this is one of the fastest growing populations in the US, and they are notoriously pacifistic, to the point of forbidding mustaches because they are associated with the military
> During the French and Indian War, the Hochstetler Massacre occurred: Local tribes attacked the Jacob Hochstetler homestead in the Northkill settlement on September 19, 1757. The sons of the family took their weapons but father Jacob did not allow them to shoot due to the Anabaptist doctrine of nonresistance.[10] Jacob Sr.'s wife, Anna (Lorentz) Hochstetler, a daughter (name unknown) and Jacob Jr. were killed by the Native Americans. Jacob Sr. and sons Joseph and Christian were taken captive. Jacob escaped after about eight months, but the boys were held for several years.[150] When freed, both of these sons joined the church and one of them became a minister
I mean, it is plausible op meant nature, but they asked about not high density housing
I for one see a lot of value in yet another big congested city, and very little value in a forest (only instrumental value, to keep humans, dogs and a handful of other preferred species alive) -- I would prefer the big city not to be as congested, and I would keep some forest as a tourism destination for people who like that, and also enough forest to not cause harm to the "humans and dogs" populatin, but that is that -- instrumental forest, not as an end goal
Let's!
Your optimization strategy can be tried, is being tried, and is yielding results.
Por que no los dos, though?
Hopefully those breeder subcultures will inherit the earth. Hopefully not nazis though. Care to start a non-nazi breeder subculture?
I want to fiddle with both sides of that particular funnel
I am not saying that you are wrong, but this might not be evidence for a 'nurture' hypothesis as opposed to a 'nature' one.
We do need innovation in tech, and in supply chains, and in products, and for that capitalism is wonderful
We do not need innovation in how to ignore labour laws (uber) renters protections (airbnb). We do not need lower marginal top tax rates, and accumulation in the 1%.
We also need innovation in how to stop runaway capitalist cycles (and, again, I am hoping western democracies will learn from china how to do that before it is too late)
After all, buildings and higher density is possible, transit is possible.
Where I live (sao paulo) there are many people on the streets. However, there is housing for all of them. That just lies empty. For speculation and seeking higher rents. For airbnb and skirting renters protection laws.
We don't have too much people, we have capital that is too accumulated at the top and that expects too high returns
In the genius funnel, the article argues to increase intake, you are arguing to enlarge the 'goes to school' step.
Porque no los dos?
https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=applicatio...
Metaphorical you of course. Parent does not want to run it. I believe this is a moral error and a coordination failure, and that saying a computer that is out of your control is "more of a computer" while a computer that actually does what you say is a 'toy' is disingenuous.
It is an unfortunate fact that you pay for freedom with effort. IDK if it ever was not so.
I am just logging a protest, I have absolutely no interest in discussing it.