samsin
samsin on Hacker News
The laws you want enforced to prevent kids from gambling were the subject of debate too.
There's an ongoing debate in Australia to ban gambling advertisements. One of the arguments that is supportive of a ban says that children shouldn't be exposed to gambling advertisements during sports broadcasts, as they should be family friendly.
Should that argument be ignored too?
Just 2 minutes and a $99USD/year Apple Developer account.
My understanding was that n-shot prompting just referred to the number of examples included in a prompt, not the number of prompts to achieve the desired result.
"Build a 3D platformer game from scratch, in raw WebGL, with no game engine or 3D library" would be a zero-shot prompt.
Given the timing, seems more related to domestic politics.
The Snowden files that implicated US agencies and social media companies?
'Large pull requests are hard to review' is a good reason to keep PRs small, but small PRs also encourage continuous integration/delivery/deployment. Stacked PRs sound like they encourage long-lived feature branches instead.
This thread [1] on Zuckerberg from 7+ years ago doesn't look too different. Top comments saying it's "pretty cringe-y", another posting an image from Reddit and some "Twitter bingo cards". The nature of the situation doesn't really offer much for deep analysis, but the discussion yesterday [2] on the product itself seems fine to me. You might disagree since people are more skeptical rather than being glad Meta is pushing it.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16803775
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45283306
Yes, considering it was ~2 years from freezing withdrawals to the approved bankruptcy plan to repay customers.
FTX was only able to repay customers because the value of BTC increased during that time. But customers were only repaid the value of their portfolio at the time of the collapse.
If I steal your money, invest it, then return the principal amount after 2 years, would you consider it financial harm?
Can you share the code it produced?
Claiming that Meta distributed pirated works is still a copyright claim, but you're correct that it's seemingly irrelevant to the fair use argument (which the article acknowledges).
The same argument could be made for physical cash
>Incredibly difficult to estimate this, in large part because the probabilities are so small.
The UN chief has been stating that the risk of nuclear warfare is at the highest point in decades. Not because of the risk of a 'fuckup', but due to geopolitical tensions. Historically the risk has been highest during periods of geopolitical tension.
Nuclear war between US and Russia is less likely with Trump
>high support of these measures from the public
The public support is for an age limit of social media (which already exists), not necessarily the measures to achieve it which are yet to be determined. There's not 68% support of using measures like digital ID.
and tech companies avoid paying tax in many countries through dirty accounting tricks, such as redirecting their profits to tax havens like Ireland.
>Honestly, we should look to fix the issues that lead to people depending on weed, alcohol, and other drugs instead.
It doesn't have to be exclusive or. People are looking to fix these issues. In the mean time, we don't have to ruin people's lives by convicting them as felons.
In React, 'rendering' means creating the DOM nodes and 'painting' refers to browser rendering [1]. So with server-side rendering the DOM nodes are 'rendered' by the server and the browser 'paints' it.
[1] https://react.dev/learn/render-and-commit
Slight correction, you have to pay a levy if you earn over ~90k/year and don’t have private hospital cover.
Uploading music seems to work fine for Apple Music. It’s been a while since I’ve done it, but all the songs I’ve uploaded in the past are still available on all my devices.
Have you looked at .NET MVC with Blazor? It might be overkill for your needs, but the templates give you a good starting point to avoid the usual boilerplate.
Participate by force? Legitimate!
Participate voluntarily? Imaginary!
More likely free users with their own accounts. Subscribed users are a subset of all users and I wouldn’t be surprised if unsubscribed users were the larger group.
>No one can simply state "I am not interested in Bitcoin" in a discussion without triggering some "response". Regardless of the merits of Bitcoin, or absence of them, that is fscked up. Red flag.
If the topic is some positive news about a technology (Bitcoin or otherwise), and your only contribution is "I am not interested in this" then you'll probably trigger a response. Might also be time to revisit the commenting guidelines.
The decision is out of sensitivity for the victim’s family, and the examples are videos recreating the events of their murder. I think you’ll be fine recreating Shirley Temple…
I believe the argument is that it makes it easier for institutions like fund managers and businesses because they don't need to be concerned with custodianship.