rufustherag
Re:ISRO to launch Google satellite
on Sunday February 08, 2015 @03:21PM (#9018385)
Thanks for the info, looks like quite a few reliable launch vehicles out there. I was mostly just trying to counter the kneejerk comment higher up about insurance and Indian rockets.
Re:ISRO to launch Google satellite
on Sunday February 08, 2015 @10:16AM (#9017429)
Google PSLV. It's over two decades since their last launch failure (and 18 years since a partial failure). At least 26 consecutive successful launches since the late 90's putting over 70 satellites into orbit. it also holds the record for the most satellites successfully put into orbit in a single launch.
Re:Ground Collision Avoidance System ‘Saves’ First F-16 in Syria
on Sunday February 08, 2015 @05:21AM (#9016903)
Google 'isis' aalong with beheadings, rape, child slavery, sex slaves, burning people alive, burying people alive etc. Alternatively buy a newspaper from time to time.
Re:ISRO to launch Google satellite
on Sunday February 08, 2015 @05:17AM (#9016897)
Probably not necessary. The Indian rockets are generally more cost effective and reliable than the American ones.
Re:ISRO to launch Google satellite
on Sunday February 08, 2015 @04:08AM (#9016812)
Ah yes, Google, working hard to make '1984' a reality for the purpose of profits and advertising.
Re:The Computer Science Handbook: First Draft [pdf]
on Sunday February 08, 2015 @04:03AM (#9016803)
The book covers more advanced data structures too. You'd be amazed by the experienced developers was use basic arraylists, and occasionally hash tables without any idea if how they actually work. They get systems to work without knowing the underlying details, which for some industries is seemingly considered ok.
Re:Cloud Computing Patterns
on Sunday February 08, 2015 @03:40AM (#9016771)
Cloud isn't any more a buzzword than Internet is a buzzword or network or cumputer were buzzwords before that. From what I can see it looks pretty decent, just costs and arm and a leg like most books from Springer. If anything it will likely be quite dry and academic with lots of references.
Re:The Computer Science Handbook: First Draft [pdf]
on Sunday February 08, 2015 @01:26AM (#9016582)
It's enough cs for most practical purposes as a programmer (only from looking at the table of contents so far), which is probably the target audience.
Re:The Computer Science Handbook: First Draft [pdf]
on Sunday February 08, 2015 @01:21AM (#9016576)
After conducting many interviews of candidates I'm pretty sure that description fits at least 60-70% of experienced programmers.