ronronron09
1: Barrons 2: Financial Times 3: Economist 4: Bloomberg 5: Foreign Policy 6: Foreign Affairs 7: WSJ/NY Times (switch off every now and then so essentially interchangeable, NY Times has a broader focus, WSJ is more focused on the markets and business. I get a lot of business and markets news elsewhere, so the NY Times is usually my preferred option.)
I'm assuming this is a good score, I'm very interested in getting a mortgage in the very near future so it's important I know how well I am scoring.
"Vitamin D won't ""keep you safe"" from COVID-19. That is misleading at best, most likely simply inaccurate, and at worst - it's downright dangerous.
As it has been discussed in SEVERAL threads, here and in alt-meds - and even in your own post - it is the lack of a deficiency that can help the body handle exposure to the virus. Supplementing if you are NOT deficient in D, won't help. Taking more than your body needs to prevent it from becoming deficient - won't help.
It's possible that people need more than science has previously believed, but that is a matter of the RDA, not a matter of being ""safe"" from COVID-19. Read more on https://www.canadadrugsdirect.com/
Vitamin D can't cure COVID-19 and it can't prevent it. However - a Vitamin D DEFICIENCY might have a correlation with a lowered resistance to the virus. If you are not deficient, then taking MORE won't raise your resistance. If it did, then the vaccine would already be out, and it would be primarily Vitamin D, and ""big pharma"" would be making a small fortune on it. "
Vitamin D is an essential micronutrient with a central role in maintaining health. I recommend prudent daily sun exposure to support the natural production of vitamin D in our skin as one of the best ways to get enough of this vitamin. But if, like many these days, you have few opportunities to go outside due to work, school, or weather, you may be at risk for vitamin D deficiency. Here are more info on vitamin D: https://www.canadapharmacy.com/