rizkeyz

No, 100W is without heat (I should have mentioned that) and without hot water.

I was talking explicitly about electricity only. It's clear that I depend on so much more for all the surroundings to work. But the figures I pulled out are for electricity only and our country has 26% of its electricity generated by gas, which we could get rid of if people would use less electricity, which I believe is totally possible.

I haven't talked about anything else. But even this tiny area can make a difference. This is where people have most or even all the control.

True! Our heating is to a large part based on fossil sources, but we started to move towards more renewable sources, like wood briquettes - which would be CO2-neutral. Indeed we could switch at least 50% of our heating to climate-neutral sources right now.

Here residential energy accounts for 26% of the overall energy consumption - but even if we only adjust in this field, we can already make a difference.

Yes sure. For example, I cannot even give you exact numbers of the footprint of the food we eat or the electronics we use. That would probably a good number to put on a lot of things, in terms of allowing people to make decisions not only on price and quality but hidden costs.

The problem is that externalities are what the name says: things you are not required to factor into your price (something or someone else takes a hit).

One part is generation, the other is consumption.

I did the math. I live in a European Country that wants to get rid of Russian Gas, and right quick. If every household would use the same amount of energy that we use (and used over the past years, 3 people, we average 2.4KWh per day - or the equivalent of a continuously burning 100W light bulb), we would not need 90TWh p.a. (the country produces around 490TWh p.a) - which would allow us to get rid of Gas for energy entirely easily.

This is war, but everywhere I look the lights are on and people only save if there's a price spike.

We live comfortably on low energy, we use modern appliances like a dish washer and $400 washing machine which has a good footprint (worked for over 8 years, only one cosmetic repair necessary). We have laptops, tablets, smartphones, router, I used to run a webserver 24/7 for a while too. There is nothing that we miss and our footprint is below average. It's not difficult, in fact, it's liberating.

I hope people start to wake up.

PS. I could go on how good it feels to live on a low profile. Lucky us, we never owned a car and require one only a few times a year, and we use a car share service for that. We care for our electronics and use smartphones and laptops for at least five years or more. I own two pairs of shoes and try to go shopping for clothing only once a year. We do not fly, unless absolutely necessary. We try to buy and eat local food, try to be low on meat consumption. And the list goes on and on and on. We are doing this for years and I could not be happier about it.

At this point in time (2022) I consider everything below say 40TB not big (textual) data at all. It can be compressed 40TB -> 10TB (or less) and that fits fine on a single 16T drive.

For many questions, you won't need all the raw data, so you end up with some form of projection of the data that is maybe 1/10 in size, so 10TB -> 1TB. Heck, if you tune GNU sort a bit, it will blast through that TB quite quickly.

Exactly. Basically most big data lives in hdfs and hdfs is part of hadoop. Even if you use Spark and Flink I would classify that as using Hadoop (under the hood).

> However, a very common setup is to use Flink to analyze data stored in the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS). -- https://wints.github.io/flink-web//faq.html

This. While I believe the part about chaos and surprise and fake reports it also makes it seem that Russia is weak - which is probably dangerous to assume (of any undefeated opponent).

However, one positive note to get out of this in any case is that with the current trajectory, even without any further outside intervention going beyond the current state of affairs will likely bring the Russian special operation to an end, be it that supplies are running out or people just start to lose overview or just that you cannot succeed if maybe 20-40% of your forces are gone even before you capture one bigger target. Russia supposedly already lost 10% of their attack army and they don't have a lot to show for it. It also explains their attack patterns getting more weird, uncivilized and cruel (e.g. "we have to do something", even if it is firing on nuclear power plants).

Next step likely will be Belarus troops and supplies entering the game, which makes it more obvious that Moscow was absolutely clueless. Belarus was on the brink of a regime change just last summer - the order to go to war with Russia against Ukraine will send Belarus over the edge, I am virtually certain about that.

I switched from a normal school to a gifted school at age 12. The biggest plus was that when all your peers have measured iq 130 or more, you do not have to feel ashamed to be "just curious" - which I believe most kids there were, albeit on very different levels.

People there really hacked themselves into all kinds of things, be it making your own PCB, learning six different languages, caring for paedomorphic salamanders, writing lyric, or building your "own" copies of popular software products. None of that seemed particularly strange to us young teenagers.

My predication, for the record: Putin is mad, old, and he certainly would not care to die these days looking outside the window into a sea of mushroom clouds. I'm virtually certain that he had at least one dream about this in his sleep - maybe long time ago, in the '80s.

So he is mad, surrounded by yes-man with a populace that is used to being lied to all the time, used to the feeling that they know more than what is allowed to say publicly, you can read The Master and Margarita, written about hundred years ago, that describes this same exact feeling.

Ukrainians, in an act of fatal heroism will fight; all that gets bloody. Kiev stands; Russians will try to starve the city to death; won't let any humanitarian help into the city; West will try to not lose their cool about the atrocities; but then something happens; some image that just surpasses the cruel picture of war we already have; people in West will demand justice; it will be hard to be bystanders when millions of lives are at stakes so obviously. That will be on a Friday. On Sunday, we defconned our way back to the stone age; world population will be back to 500M to 1B within this year.

And a new world will be born.

Every company that hires three junior developers today will need one senior developer in a year or two. It's great to be a developer today, even better, if you are a senior dev.

I did the back-of-the-envelope math once. You get a Petabyte of storage today for $60K/year if you buy the hardware (retail disks, server, energy). It actually fits into the corner of a room. What do you get for $60K in AWS S3? Maybe a PB for 3 months (w/o egress).

If you replace all your hardware every year, the cloud is 4x more expensive. If you manage to use your getto-cloud for 5 year, you are 20x cheaper than Amazon.

To store one TB per person on this planet in 2022, it would take a mere $500M to do that. That's short change for a slightly bigger company these days.

I guess by 2030 we should be able to record everything a human says, sees, hears and speaks in an entire life for every human on this planet.

And by 2040 we should be able to have machines learning all about human life, expression and intelligence to slowly making sense of all of this.

Rip, Lorinda. I'm using bc almost daily.

Just for a moment imagine a world without any ads. I for one do not have to imagine that, but just have to remember back, when I grew up in the eastern block.

What you wanted to buy was available in the stores and you could always ask someone, if you needed something very special.

If an ad were merely a statement of existence - but that not what ads have become: "brand refresh", "pivot", "awareness", "emotion", or any other subtle or not so subtle message that wants to influence you. I see so many people driven to "buy" things they do not need and then "buy" again books on how to clean the mess up. From where I'm standing, this is all just very ridiculous at this point.

Note that I am not saying there is a free will, not at all, but hey, do I want to this endless mostly senseless stream of unneeded stuff let influence me or something a little more grounded?

Just say you reject, no need to explain - I believe this is the way of the least drama.

My advice would be to target a situation where clients search for you, rather the other way around (everything else I find unsustainable). For that you need to put your work out, like breadcrumbs - so the interested party gets curious and reaches out.

Has worked for me for the past seven years. The cost of putting your work out is basically zero these days - all you have to do it put the time in, which you have to do in one way or another anyway.

Not my field of expertise, but if I were a data science consultant I'd make sure I'm a top ten (%) kaggle person, and so on.

You are now looking back at a significant part of your life and that is changing your perspective. Not only are you not going to be younger in the future, but you may not enjoy the agility that you had, good looks, and all other niceties of youth.

Our western civilizations do not value age that much these days, it's not a good fit for the always-on high-throughput life required to not go under.

Some get lucky, married, have children, which yet again gives you a different perspective on life (and you start to see how little things matter that you thought matter). This can be a significant impulse through your 30's and 40's.

A guy I know is forever single, about your age - a cultivated man, who enjoys a few recreational activities, but who also wastes a lot of time (something people with kids cannot afford any more).

Not sure what has been driving you, but with a nice chunk of savings try to cut back on stuff you do not really value for a few years and try to refocus on a thing that captures your spirits, whatever that may be.

You probably need to let life capture you again, in its weird ways and I see some people just not crazy enough to allow themselves to.

The clowns you are referring to are people with brains that look at more than just leetcode problems.

I can attest that exposure to quite dysfunctional environments have hardened my technical skills to a level which currently opens one opportunity after another. What other people shy away from, I eat for breakfast and be done with it.

Many years ago, I found the character of the "The Wolf" in pulp fiction fascinating: a person who basically does normal, regular things in dysfunctional environments and charges a premium for that. I love when people call me, when the project is overdue, when nothing seems to work, when they ran out of options. Strangely, I seem to thrive in these settings.

We live at the dawn of cyberterrorism, I'm glad we are stepping out of nuclear now.

Exactly, we do not need it. If it weren't for job negotiations I'd be making all my contributions on the net masked.

Not OP but I would have an issue with that. I do not want to "copy" what is already there, because many things out there are just not good. Someone making a million basically doing nothing is bad, if most people have to work a few centuries to amass that wealth. Inequality is not good, not because everyone is equal, but because you are just using an unfair advantage.

I do not want to copy that. I do not want to support this way of living.

(Also, I do not think I'm whining. I'm in the top income bracket in my country, have some talent and was gifted with some brain at birth and healthiness. But, you know, most of these things are not my doing - I was lucky many times over, and often I see people working 100x harder than me not ending up nearly in the same spot. Is that a good society?)

For programming, I still rely on google as my navigational engine, although a search engine that indexed a couple dozen sizes would probably suffice for me.

It's a matter of motivation. I had project flushing in speed, with correct, tested code, happy clients and I also had other assignments, where a feature that that should take a week took a year.

That's insane about our field, the sheer variance in so many things we do.

Kind of agree. I learn all the time, through writing posts, using an mooc platform, coding sites, I search in scholarly search engines, read books.

There is not one "learning" platform that covers all these cases, let alone cover well. The activities and the learning modes are too diverse, I would not trust any single entity to cover all of them.

You must be kidding me. Color me old-fashioned, but software development for me is still a "serious" job - one that requires years of training, focus and patience to get through all the matter.

And you tell me these people don't give a single fuck?

Static binaries are a different story. Go has dependencies as any other modern language and they had a bad story in the past and have a better story today.

Sketch for python: Create a ~/.cache/python/packages directory. Manage all dependencies there. Make the python interpreter "package aware" so that required dependencies are read off a file from the current project (e.g. "py.mod") and adjust "system path" accordingly and transparently. Or something along those lines.

No extra tool, a single location, an easy to explain workflow (add a py.mod file, add deps there with versions, etc).

I'm just thinking out loud, but it does not need to be hard.

This is the real legacy problem: Python comes from a world, where only one version of one packaged seemed the right way to do.

I do not have a good idea, but other ecosystems evolved much more sane in the realm of packaging. While not ideal, Go has done a fairly good job - and the "module" operations are instant - which they should be.

I could take 7 month off from my job - all I have to say is when - it's the law and I could not be happier.

The child got off the ground well and I think it stems from both parents being regularly present during the first year. Also, being a young parent is stressful, so it's good to share the effort.

If all goes well, my kid will be a productive member of society - so maybe it's not just family friendly, but profitable, too.