rfool
Because they like to argue based on contemporary state of progress and process and well, about a state that incorporates anything from science to politics to whatever…
For example, where I live, we separate our waste, while its clear most of it is going to be burned in a cement factory anyway. Not perfect, but not an actual argument for or against recycling, right?
However, taste modulates wildly.
IMHO, with the second paragraph, Aaron starts to fade into background. While you increasingly describe your character in-depth, but also more and more often seem to advert an urge to apologize for ... something. I wonder what that is!?
Interestingly, whenever I failed, the correct answer felt totally obvious - and I wonder how this observation relates to frame semantics theory?
And not being native english speaker (as you, reading my comment, may have noticed) makes this harder, but still an exciting game.
Everyone is free to overcompensate, remunerate, juxtapose, aggravate, frustrate, vandalize, …
Did anyone assure that this code is using a recursive mutex???
Because, well, lol, a second lock on a non-recursive mutex would look like what is reported here.
KISS and gn8
But I am too lazy, to proof or falsify that.
We are in post-factual age anway, right?
Instead, find out why this happens, first.
Ideas are worth nothing. Even if they shine
You cannot steal it from us and relabel as british! No, Sir!
BTW: your examples stink.
From first to last one:
> Sarah: Built a fusion reactor at 16. Now? Debugging fintech payment systems.
Nice, but that fusion reactor? Where is it? Did she really accomplish something?