rfctr
LOL OMFG!
MILE WIDE !!! MINEFIELDS !!!
May be the confusion is with USA-Mexico border? o_O
The only thing I hold against him is his failure, as promised, to hang Georgian president by his balls. Eating necktie is a weak substitute.
But that is somehow bad, eh? o_O
P.S. Hey, Alex, why stop at Osama?! You forgot to mention Hitler! That would be more dramatic, and equally cheap brainwashing tactic.
Putin is a man of his word, and expects the same from Snowden.
Information may continue to leak, but not from Snowden. His part of the show is finished (and luckily for him, he's not even bruised!).
You see? The online purchases are not as unregulated as they may seem. There are laws about them, and the online companies do follow those laws.
Trying to sell banned service to US customer is not much easier than trying to sell banned food. One may try but the interested troll only need to send a cease-and-desist to yet another payment processor one uses to sell to US, and the service is on square one, again.
Try to get bigger though or get a investment round, and troll will come after you.
It is not a coincidence that the company in the article's got trolls about the same time it's got an investment.
Now, step two: US trolls will not sue a company doing business outside of US; too much trouble. But any company doing business in US is a subject to local laws, and most SaaS companies want to work on US market simply because it is the biggest one.
"Doing business in US" means, among other things, having US customers and using US payment processors.
He's just joking, right? Surely he has neither tools nor intentions to put someone out of business?
Why would they do that? o_O
They will file at their local US court. You're free to sell to Nevis all that you want -- but do not come with your product into US until the US litigation is won.
Most companies though prefer to settle out of court because the court is quite a gambling, that's why we do not hear it more often.
Example:
http://www.ca.com/ca/en/news/Press-Releases/na/2013/CA-Techn...
"... seeking ... an injunction against AppDynamics prohibiting the infringement of CA Technologies patents"
In case CA wins, the court will prohibit AppDynamics to sell any product that violate CA's patents.
Yes, one may host the company in Canada. How to sell to US customers though? VISA, MC and AMEX all have US presence and will comply with the court order (CA's lawyers will undoubtfully provide a copy). Paypal and other various Stripes are just facades to the very same VISA et all.
Without ability to charge for the product, where the business is going to be?
Common, don't be shy! Don't pretend there are some "non-democratic" governments somewhere that do even more surveillance!
Largest ever launched by any government, by far.
It doesn't matter where you're located. What matters where you want to do business.
They would make sure you're behind bars in no time.
Tomorrow Bitbucket can get under the same attack.
http://www.stlport.org/news.html
Apache project looks like "me too" one.