reptantchaos92
Re:OLPC’s $100 laptop was going to change the world
on Monday April 16, 2018 @12:46PM (#16850433)
Thanks, that seems pretty much what I'm looking for. Any experience with the device? I would like to run it with another board to support a more free approach (at least whatever is possible in the sorry state of SBC)
Re:OLPC’s $100 laptop was going to change the world
on Monday April 16, 2018 @12:43PM (#16850400)
He's just 4, so a rugged device is a must. Also, one of the great things about these laptops was that they felt like a learning device, without sacrificing the general purpose computing aspect. Since I would like to avoid a consumer device, this is what I'm expecting.
This pi-top seems like what I want, I need to check if it works with another board.
Re:OLPC’s $100 laptop was going to change the world
on Monday April 16, 2018 @12:00PM (#16849928)
I got one on the buy one, give one initiative; and being cheap was only a plus, but it was great for it's purpose; as a kid's laptop.
I gave it away a few years ago to someone who could give it a better use (teacher), but now that I have a kid on my own, I'd like to give him something like this. Any recommendations?
Re:Portland Anarchist Road Care Fixes Potholes Anonymously (2017)
on Thursday April 05, 2018 @01:18PM (#16766831)
While it can be argued that this takes us some steps backward in time, this is not barter, it's gift economy. Barter never existed outside some few events and capitalist ideologist imagination ;-).
Re:Portland Anarchist Road Care Fixes Potholes Anonymously (2017)
on Thursday April 05, 2018 @09:55AM (#16764903)
People have always worked to make their environment better for themselves and everyone prior to capitalism. Perhaps you're the one who bought into the propaganda and claim for capitalism properties that have nothing to do with it as a mode of production.
Re:Reddit holds the secret to fixing Facebook
on Wednesday March 14, 2018 @05:52PM (#16588636)
>If you have to ban an idea, it seems inherently evident to me that the idea contains some irrefutable truth that can only be silenced, not defeated.
Expecting a "rational" debate while spouting such irrational views is quite absurd. Most people, and that probably includes myself, will hold some views in high regard; convinced that are rational, whilist being just like your example pretty much a fallacy.
I find quite laughable that some jerks cry about censorship when a private company denies them access to a site, while they propose to use physical force and violence to deny access to other people to a physical place.