reagle

I’ve been looking forward to whenever 1.0 for a few years now. Looks like it’s actually close now!

- 2. Guiding Principles

- 2.1. Be humble

- 2.2. Be bold

- 2.3. Put humanity front and center

- 2.4. Lean into learning

- 2.5. Teach with intentionality

- 2.6. No one size fits all

- 2.7. Augmentation not automation

- 2.8. Think beyond the classroom and the campus

- 3. Recommendations

- 3.1. Adapt educational processes for an AI-aware world

- 3.1.1. Revisit course goals

- 3.1.2. Ensure durable learning through new course policies, structures, and forms of assessment

- 3.1.3. Emphasize experiential and project-based learning

- 3.1.4. Build structured in-person social learning into subjects

- 3.1.5. Preserve and expand out-of-class research and career experiences

- 3.1.6. Reconsider grades and incentives

- 3.1.7. Expand in-person spaces for labs and in-person evaluation

- 3.1.8. Provide AI use policies, with justification

- 3.1.9. Exercise caution with AI detectors and online exam platforms

- 3.1.10. Support responsible experimentation in the curriculum

- 3.2. Center people, community, and the residential experience

- 3.2.1. Define and communicate the value of residential education

- 3.2.2. Strengthen social connection and personal wellbeing

- 3.2.3. Encourage instructor disclosure around their own AI use

- 3.2.4. Teach effective, responsible, and ethical use of AI

- 3.2.5. Recognize and mitigate negative impacts of AI

- 3.2.6. Acknowledge AI use in theses and other research work

- 3.3. Build processes, teams, and tools for continuous reflection, iteration, and improvement

- 3.3.1. Establish an ongoing AI and education committee

- 3.3.2. Create school/college- or department-level AI Leads

- 3.3.3. Fund AI Fellows and an AI Implementation Team

- 3.3.4. Create an AI Pilot Fund

- 3.3.5. Provide ongoing training and instructor support

- 3.3.6. Develop metrics

- 3.3.7. Ensure equitable technology access

- 3.3.8. Protect sensitive data and preserve model choice

- 3.3.9. Establish privacy, logging, and auditing policies

- 3.3.10. Monitor AI costs and environmental impact

- 4. Conclusion

That's what I wondered.

visidata is vim influenced.

This is why John MacFarlane designed djot https://djot.net/

On github, I see an asciinema tag, but no explanation of the differences?

So they were the baddies?

This could be a nice pre-filter for VisiData…?

To extend your Lego metaphor to the question of “is a lot of this irrelevant?“ Does your Lego model of a city need to have interior floors, furniture, and fixtures in order to satisfy your requirements? Perhaps in some cases, but not in most.

What's so complicated about his legacy? I read the article and don't see it.

I provide this because it was the basis of this paper: "”Be Nice”: Wikipedia Norms for Supportive Communication" https://reagle.org/joseph/2010/06/reagle-nrhm-special-collab...

> Wikipedia is acknowledged to have been home to “some bitter disputes”. Indeed, conflict at Wikipedia is said to be “as addictive as cocaine”. Yet, such observations are not cynical commentary but motivation for a collection of social norms. These norms speak to the intentional stance and communicative behaviors Wikipedians should adopt when interacting with one another. In the following pages, I provide a survey of these norms on the English Wikipedia and argue they can be characterized as supportive based on Jack Gibb’s classic communication article “Defensive Communication”.

I’ve been waiting for them to release a standalone markdown editor, but it’s been a couple years already now.

You might want to check out perplexity.AI. It has access to many of these models, and it’s trivial to switch models mid conversation and ask it to repeat itself, so that you can see the differences.

I have a wrapper for the many ways you might convert something to a text document in the terminal.

https://github.com/reagle/pandoc-wrappers/blob/main/doc2txt....

I had to abandon MC on Mac because it didn’t work with zsh. https://midnight-commander.org/ticket/4198

Sethi did something like this in 2012 and his minder could slap him if he got distracted.

https://hackinglife.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/npc7g21v#quadrupled...

I use and like CalendarBridge because it can also sync multiple calendars.

https://calendarbridge.com/

I can’t see what this offers over pandoc markdown or it’s successor:

https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/jgm/djot/b...

pandoc has great citation support, not sure what you mean by macros.

when I wrote about exit in open communities ("410 Gone - Infocide in Open Content Communities") 10 years ago, I included the _why case, and here his work is restored a decade later!

https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/spir/article/view/821...

Frontiers has a great review/publication model https://www.frontiersin.org/about/peer-review/

I’m still stuck pre78 because I like to use an external editor. https://github.com/exteditor/exteditor/issues/74

https://www.rtings.com/ It’s really good at what they cover.

Read his excellent book Confessions. Because he criticizes unethical/corrupt engineering practices his enemies say he is bringing ill repute upon the profession and violating the terms of his license.

The Maestral client does the trick for me: stays silent and works.

It is perhaps a false dichotomy to say that you cannot give formative and summarize feedback.

Huh! I’ve had something like this since the 90s, working with smart tech folk. I haven’t shared it with anyone in over a decade because I know how weird it would appear to normals.

Reagle’s Collaborative Work Style

https://reagle.org/joseph/2003/collab-style.html

Freeplane now

Sadly, I’m still stuck with 68 so I can keep using the external editor plugin.