reactor4

Ground effect was used in F1 between 1978 and 1982. Ayrton Senna died in 1994.

If you believe that then I have some lumber to sell to you.

You don't see the cooperation and coordination in the video you just linked?

[...] would be far left in the US.

That commission didn't "measure" any other jurisdiction so what are you talking about? And because there was "a massive investigation into it" doesn't mean it's worse than elsewhere, if anything it implies the contrary.

Not really because what you would have learned is that it's better to plot your route beforehand thus freeing your mind to listen to your audiobook.

Not in my experience.

Agreed, that's what /opt is for.

Nissan's CVT seem to be a counterexample of everything in your first paragraph.

I could also bring a lot of counterexamples to your second paragrah (e.g.: many german cars).

Read the Horowitz report. They fed you lies.

Well that's the point, isn't it?

“lock screen with CP”

read it again...

Thank you, Is there an answer key to those?

pff! stileproject for one.

Sorry to say but you’re the one doing what you accuse others of doing.

May I ask you what you wrote? I’m interested.

> There are tonnes of critics and conspiracy theorists.

'sh run' doesn't show hardware information.

Wow

No he meant “being the author of an article".

Hi, my name is reactor and I'm an addict.

I can concur, I'm going on two months of sobriety from alcohol and stimulants tomorrow morning, only on using the 1st three steps and my employer's EAP. For now, the 1st three steps are enough to get me going plus an intense fear of where I was headed for (jails or institutions or death). I know I will have to ask for help to complete the 4th step but I still don't talk a lot at the meetings beside presenting myself when I'm asked so this will come when I'm ready or meet a suitable sponsor I guess. Maybe I will ask publicly if someone is looking for a "protégé" - is that the right word? - and would be interested to help me when I go get my 2 months' key ring on Saturday evening. I think it would avoid the awkwardness of asking to many people. Anyway, what Cliff is saying is exactly right as far as I can tell so far..

* I'm also reading Russell Brand's book on the 12 steps, it's called "Freedom from Our Addictions". It's a very good "update" for newer generations about what the 12 steps are and why you should follow them if you need to.

That's the thing though, the goals are constantly shifting and you cannot make assumptions about how other people are going to react. For example when you say "I can ask either sex if they are interested in forming a non-business relationship and then go back to a business relationship if they say no." I really feel that in the current climate this is a very risky move to make.

Current events does not make his response unreasonable. Yours neither but if the one doing the hiring is a male, then, guess what.

No it doesn't destroy the sentence structure but it does destroy his argument, especially given that the "mistake" he was pointing out was very far fetched and not really a mistake at all.

statute

offshore leaks database: https://offshoreleaks.icij.org/

Plus the supply chain which also have global value when it's time to acquire parts wherever you are located when the plane breaks down (or just need new parts).

This method, it was called the "love-in" [1], was used by the Canadian government in 1995. It was illegal as hell as it was a blatant violation of election spending laws.

Some people say it was counterproductive but the proof is in the pudding I guess.

[1] https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/book-r...

> and profitability numbers