ramdac
Re:Missing open-source contributor presents a dilemma when accepting t...
on Monday November 04, 2024 @09:59AM (#42042094)
this seems to be the most logical course of action taken.
Re:Has anyone noticed how overrun by bots Reddit has become?
on Wednesday September 04, 2024 @06:48AM (#41444100)
people are capitalizing on the fact that google ranks reddit so highly, but are also bringing the quality down as a result.
Re:Everything You Should Know about the Legendary Valjoux 7750 Chronog...
on Saturday June 29, 2024 @05:56AM (#40829061)
it has a stopwatch. It's that simple.
Re:K3s – Lightweight Kubernetes
on Thursday October 12, 2023 @09:56AM (#37857204)
how do you pronounce it? kuberthreeties?
Re:White Rabbit Project
on Friday June 23, 2023 @12:12PM (#36448875)
What happens when the roundtrip time isn't consistent?
Re:Scott Aaronson weighs in on purported quantum factoring breakthrough
on Thursday January 05, 2023 @11:02AM (#34261688)
Tl;dr? = there's no breakthrough.
Re:A memory of Bob Morris
on Friday July 01, 2011 @03:44AM (#2717422)
what strikes me is how differently 'hacking' is viewed today in the mainstream. Try any of that at a company as big as IBM, and you'll likely be rotting in a cell as a suspected cyber terrorist.
ok maybe I exaggerate, but I can't help but think how innocent those times sound in this story.
Re:Telescopictext
on Monday May 16, 2011 @01:36AM (#2551769)
This is how cliff's notes should work.
Re:Are You a Hacker?
on Friday May 13, 2011 @02:29PM (#2545614)
Are you asking because you are looking for answers? Either way, yes.
Re:How Bin Laden Sent and Received Email
on Thursday May 12, 2011 @10:55PM (#2543354)
or thought he could. Isn't that what ultimately took him down?
Re:FBI: If We Told You . . . (Part II)
on Thursday May 12, 2011 @10:00PM (#2543214)
I can attest to this. I've seen these orders.
Re:FBI: If We Told You . . . (Part II)
on Thursday May 12, 2011 @09:55PM (#2543202)
I actually like this idea. Where does facebook sit in that scale? I imagine pretty close to telco.
Re:FBI: If We Told You . . . (Part II)
on Thursday May 12, 2011 @07:08PM (#2542719)
I couldn't have said it better myself. What I've witnessed is that companies are apt to lie down in favor of the FBI because building up a rapport with the FBI can be a good thing in certain business models. (don't ask).
The DoJ is well-aware of this, I'm sure, and is only too happy to throw its full weight around.
Re:FBI: If We Told You . . . (Part II)
on Thursday May 12, 2011 @07:05PM (#2542711)
To me, this suggests that corporations have too much power in this country. This explains why the FBI is heavy-handed with their "do not disclose" style issuances to corporations. It isn't so much that the FBI is scared the company will tip someone off, but that people in general will become more knowledgeable about these activities. This poses a risk for companies as proponents of privacy will be very outspoken.
If anything, this is a great argument for why these things SHOULD be public knowledge.
Re:Why I get my entertainment via BitTorrent
on Thursday May 12, 2011 @11:19AM (#2540854)
is an US-based proxy server an option?
edit: I see that option has been discussed elsewhere in this thread. Sorry for the repeat.
Re:This is What Irony Tastes Like: Capcom and the PSN Outage
on Thursday May 12, 2011 @09:49AM (#2540559)
It's also interesting that this utterance by Sony has shifted the whole discussion away from their own security failures.
Sony, in blaming Anonymous, has asked theem to prove a negative -- that they did NOT hack PSN. The onus isn't on anonymous to prove a negative. Sony knows they can't. It's just an effective way to shift focus on this issue away from their failure to protect customer data.