rajdavies

BTW - David Pollak didn't talk to any of the ActiveMQ team at FuseSource - else we would have helped him out - he didn't speak to any of the execs either. Its a shame he doesn't allow comments on his blog.

what version you working with?

That hasn't been the case for a long while

Its surprisingly easy to write a messaging system that meets your requirements. Having a messaging system that meets every use case is extremely difficult. ActiveMQ is deliberately highly configurable - to try and address this - ActiveMQ is now stable and performant - with a high degree of fault tolerance built in. The things you should care about - like what happens if you loose the network, a disk etc are automatically taken care of with ActiveMQ.

I'm not sure who David Pollak talked to at FuseSource - nobody on the ActiveMQ team there know him - and the execs are scratching their heads too.