railgunmerlin

seems a bit weird to complain about the model issues in a post about the harness/sites?

Interesting to see the callout to companies like harvey in the post itself as consumers rather than competitors? I guess openai isn't quite willing to step into those customer relations themselves?

notably on terry tao's (who has signed) blog but not from tao (guest post from timothy gowers)

right, surely they could've waited or even reached out? It reads as desperation to get there for marketing purposes

Does seem like they gloss over Alpöge and Buckmaster's work with the following

> While unlikely, we cannot rule out that de-identified data derived from their usage of our products helped improve our models .

Which seems a bit irresponsible/rash?

i think the tweet virality probably peaked this concept, not really sure the value/$ ratio is good enough without it

given kickstarter is november, when do you expect to ship?

curious which overseas country that doesn't fall under the 'west' has cash as king

Are we pretending this isn't a global phenomenon?

The dog date at the end was a cute deal. How much of the conclusions can be drawn on the idea that it was a "friendly" market though?

perhaps the safety filter is wrong instead of the post?

didn't they just raise last month?

anyone try e-ink style tablets (like remarkable?) the form factor/ability to backup is attractive to me but the price tag is a bit nuts...

your average neo buyer doesn't know what ssh is and would probably like media apps ranging from capcut to lightroom.

can't even really blame Alex for taking the deal, why would Zuckerberg not do more due diligence? Wang has created (a relatively) successful subcontracting operation but that doesn't mean anything about research or new models

the fear/greed index is a pure market/investing index? Or would you prefer "bear/bull" index?

Have to wonder if the IPO push for this year is genuine now