raaaaraaaa2
For example this camera module will be used soon in cars and it's really more sensitive than driver's eye : http://www.camera-module.com/download/sony-imx390-sensor-sel...
I remember when Volvo introduced IntelliSafe technology few years ago that car was totally "paranoid" and it was beeping all the time -> most of drivers deactivated that system.
https://www.adac.de/infotestrat/tests/assistenzsysteme/fussg...
Audi A4 has single monochrome camera (+well tuned image recognition HW/SW) and Eyesight system from Subaru has two cameras and it's already used for ~5 years.
...in order to build cheap vehicle which will lasts at least 10 years.
If you believe we are highly adaptable and new technologies will 'save us' somehow check this presentation : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkj_91IJVBk
...it's eye opening
Even if US and EU will be fast in adoption there's still a lot of work ahead.
I am sure that tires (in the city where is majority of cars electric) will not cause PM2.5 mayhem :)
Also VW prepares this technology : https://www.motor1.com/news/346653/brake-dust-particle-filte...
For other places around the world where electricity is more 'dirty' just drive some small car with combustion engine and maintain it as long as possible. Small car needs less energy for transport then heavy electric vehicles.
In France for sure : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_France
in China I don't think so : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_China ...however local pollution is zero so that's huge benefit for large cities of course.