r17n
Re:How I use LLMs to learn complex topics
on Sunday August 09, 2026 @07:34PM (#49237390)
Hoping you get answer to this. I have the same question.
Re:Why is programming so captivating, yet so agonizing?
on Friday July 24, 2026 @10:29AM (#49036241)
I love this comment. I never looked at it that way before. I wasn't able to articulate it but "an excuse to do math" is perfect. This resonates with me.
Re:Snowboard Kids 2 is 100% Decompiled
on Saturday May 30, 2026 @05:27AM (#48334330)
I'm so excited about this. My cousins and I still play Snowboard Kids (one) whenever we meet up.
Re:Prompt Injecting Contributing.md
on Thursday March 19, 2026 @09:22PM (#47449121)
Perhaps people wanting to show their "high GitHub productivity" to potential employers.
Re:How to talk to anyone – and why you should (The Guardian)
on Sunday March 01, 2026 @04:10PM (#47210678)
I love this. I know I struggle with "I don't want to bother this person".
How do you deal with that?
Everyone posting seems to love this. Can folks provide some of their use-cases?
Re:Leaked software engineering recruiter selection guideline
on Monday March 24, 2025 @07:46PM (#43466624)
Honest question, are these startups not also asking "leetcode puzzles within strict time controls" ?
Re:Code Navigation for AI SWEs: What We've Learned So Far
on Friday March 07, 2025 @06:24PM (#43295927)
I'm interested!
Re:Zuckerberg's rightward policy shift puts Meta staffers on edge, tar...
on Friday February 14, 2025 @10:06AM (#43049057)
I think it's relative.
In the future, if Musk has a leftward shift, I think it would be newsworthy as well.
Re:A Short Introduction to Automotive Lidar Technology
on Monday November 25, 2024 @04:47PM (#42240488)
So there's a video of him addressing this - he doesn't hate the tech. He mentions that it's wildly expensive for cars. But, they use it heavily for SpaceX
Re:Procrastination and the fear of not being good enough
on Sunday November 10, 2024 @07:31PM (#42103623)
I really like this idea. I hope this catches on.
Re:Google Med-Palm M: Towards Generalist Biomedical AI
on Thursday July 27, 2023 @09:34AM (#36893241)
I feel “require” is a bit strong. But, I think there are some interesting possibilities.
Advertising your medical practice as an “LLM-consulting” (better name needed) one in the same way there’s “Montessori” schools could be interesting.
Another option I think that would be interesting would be making the LLM patient-facing and required as one of the check-in “docs”. And then attach the results to the patient’s file for the medical professional to view.
Could also be great for pre-screening and/or suggesting a virtual visit if appropriate.