News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

poncho_romero

Re:Go 1.27 on Thursday August 20, 2026 @10:46AM (#49375366)
As a red-green colourblind person I hope not!
Re:Being Ambitious and Being a Dad on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @10:47AM (#49362382)
I did fasting for a while, usually fasting for 16+ hours and eating 1-2 meals in the eight hour feeding window, but eventually stopped in favour of working out. I'd like to be able to lift while also fasting, but I'm worried that (1) I'd struggle to hit my protein targets and (2) only eating during a small window each day would hurt muscle growth.
What about them? The Canadian healthcare system has better outcomes than the American healthcare system in several areas. Most simply, Canadians live longer.
In what world is the Republican Party pro entrepreneur/small business enough to make these rhetorical questions meaningful?
In Canada I hear keener more often than keen (although both are rare).
I wonder if despite our large vocabulary, English speakers tend to use a small subsection of it because there are so many non-native speakers. It seems to me from reading and watching people from decades ago that the language was more complex. (I don't mean this as any knock on people who speak English as a second language.)
Why would anyone be in favour of more ad breaks?
Re:The startup's Postgres survival guide on Wednesday July 22, 2026 @05:13PM (#49013502)
In the PHP back end I work on, I find the ORM immensely helpful because we need to instantiate objects to do things like permissions checks. The alternative seems like much more work. What am I missing with regards to ORMs being a bad idea?
Re:Xiaomi-Robotics-1 on Monday July 20, 2026 @10:34AM (#48979462)
Mass displacement of every sector of labour. Dissent policed by Boston Dynamic's robodogs. You will own nothing and be happy.
Re:Xiaomi-Robotics-1 on Monday July 20, 2026 @10:31AM (#48979415)
Yes but unemployment where a small cadre of rich elites own the robots and the rest of us are serfs is very different from the public owning and benefiting from the robots in the form of strong social services and UBI.
Re:Terence McKenna's Mega Bad Trip on Sunday July 19, 2026 @01:48PM (#48970177)
I'm surprised someone as enlightened as yourself can't imagine a person coming to spirituality themselves.
Why would the author write this paragraph alone using AI?
Re:The AirPods Effect on Monday June 22, 2026 @03:44PM (#48635060)
I'd love to learn about this middle road. As I said in my comment, I'm not happy with my conclusion.
Re:The AirPods Effect on Monday June 22, 2026 @03:43PM (#48635050)
Your preferred default is also entirely subjective. I'm also not an extrovert. My friends all acknowledge my extreme introversion.
Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @04:07PM (#48602678)
Eastern Canada, where people are generally easy going and friendly. I'd be surprised and disappointed to hear things are different elsewhere, but I don't have the lived experience to say one way or another.
Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @04:05PM (#48602661)
I think we see things differently. I view conversation as an offer, with no expectations either way. Whereas you seem to put more weight on it, I'd guess because the ADHD you mentioned in another comment means interruptions are more impactful for you. I'm not sure there is a way to bridge this gap, because for me (based both on my understanding of modern psychological research and personal experience), a world without talking to strangers is a much impoverished one emotionally and spiritually. I'm afraid I'm willing to throw your mental wellbeing out with the bathwater on this, though I feel bad about doing so.
Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @03:59PM (#48602597)
I think there is some truth to that, especially on public transit.
Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @03:59PM (#48602590)
You can simply decline the conversation. It's not as big of a deal as you are making it out to be. I'm not saying you have to actively opt into social interaction, whatever that means. I'm saying its reasonable for others to offer social interaction if you're in public.
Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @03:48PM (#48602478)
Saying things like "it's rude to bother people who are in public" (paraphrased) is antisocial and reflective of our time, where people live increasingly isolated and atomistic lives, not of human nature. My point is people who are not open to experiencing the lives of others around them are, as social animals, unwell. It's also worth noting that I don't think this is the fault of any individual (although my initial comment was not clear on this point) but rather of modern society which so thoroughly devalues what is human in favour of what is material and saleable.

Edit: I'm also very much an introvert, FWIW.

Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @11:46AM (#48599927)
That's fair. I'm sorry you have to deal with that.
Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @11:23AM (#48599672)
You're right, my comment is unfair. In my defense, I've had my sleep interrupted several times recently by motorcyclists trying to make as much noise as possible, so I'm a little ornery ;)
Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @11:13AM (#48599558)
I find your negative view of humanity saddening. I think most people are basically good.
Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @11:09AM (#48599514)
Common in rural eastern Canada too.
Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @11:08AM (#48599496)
Some of you are unwell.
Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @11:07AM (#48599484)
What is the public if not the space where we interact with others?
Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @11:05AM (#48599456)
I think most will pick up on subtle cues. That said, there is nothing wrong with being direct. And for those people who struggle with saying no, well, practice makes perfect.
Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @11:03AM (#48599440)
If you are in a public space, I think it's totally fair game to initiate talk. It's also totally fair game to signal that you aren't interested.
Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @11:02AM (#48599413)
Amen!
Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @11:01AM (#48599409)
Skill issue I'm afraid ;)

(Said as someone who used to feel the same way, before I discovered the joys of talking to strangers.)

Re:The AirPods Effect on Friday June 19, 2026 @10:59AM (#48599393)
> There's a lot of women who don't want to be chatted up who wear headphones

This is true, but so is the opposite! I think the most important thing is to be kind and receptive. It's fine to start a conversation with a women wearing headphones, just take it in stride and don't be weird about it if she isn't interested in talking. I do this (with men and women) a lot.

It is true that women are more likely to be approached by creeps, and due to the physical differences between the sexes women are at higher risk in such situations. That said, we shouldn't dismiss women as too delicate or whatever to chat with. They're people!

Older ยป