plint
I promise you, one, they are not anywhere close to making 200k. And I'm sure plenty of them have kids, family they need to provide for.
I comprehend the issue in terms of degrees of freedom. How free, how autonomous are you compared to the cashier at the supermarket? Choose your dimensions. Choice of work, choice of shelter, choice of food. Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Try your best to objectively evaluate your freedom in the dimensions that matter to you.
Then compare to your chosen reference worker/s. Cashier, delivery guy, warehouse worker, office worker, etc.
To claim that you are a wage slave is to claim that you have even less freedom than the rest of us. So analyze it carefully.
And if you do reach the conclusion that the guy working the checkouts has more freedom than you, the logical conclusion is for you to quit your 4 hours a week, 200k job and become a checkout worker, no?
Well, I'm sure you'll have no interviewing problems there.
See: https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.0455, which won the parody Ig Nobel prize, but I don't really understand why, as I thought it was at least as interesting as Robert Axelrod's simulation of successful strategies in the iterated prisoner's dilemma.
Not worth the risk or why?
See https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/4hlaxi/did_b...
Were you thinking of another source?
I'm asking seriously though, what would he stand to gain from hiding info about capex? Or do you think the reaction from investors is due to his attitude or signs of stress/things going wrong internally?
Actually, that seems like a really good idea to avoid being tracked by facial recognition systems. Remove enough detail from your photo so that you can't be identified by a neural net, but can still be identified by a human?