News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

plepbpl

Re:Navier–Stokes Lost in Translation on Saturday October 10, 2026 @11:42AM (#50034042)
> They are claiming that we do not know if Astra formalized all the elements of the Navier-Stokes proof in Lean correctly.

This has nothing to do with whether the lean proof certifies (the real) NS.

Re:Navier–Stokes Lost in Translation on Saturday October 10, 2026 @11:35AM (#50033955)
None of the examples are of the NS lean statement. The validity of the latter is not under question ( in this paper ). Please note the distinction between “statement of NS” and “statement of lemmas used in the NL proof of NS”.