player1234
player1234 on Hacker News
You just moved all the engineering to the tests, fucking moron.
So code is useless now, but if code is coding a test it is the only future? One again, fucking moron.
There was never a barrier to automating your office work with python unless you are a moron.
Who fooled the world scripting some known work flow of yours is fucking rocket science. It should be a requirement to even enter the fucking office building.
Learn python, the subscription for that knowledge won't be jacked up to 2000$/month when the VC money drys up.
Just learn python, what are you a child?
Basic python knowledge should be a requirement for any office job.
LLMs is a retarded way of spending trillions automating what can be done with good old reliable scripting. We haven't automated shit yet.
Except by no meteric has anyone shown how clearly transformational it is.
It is just statements like this fucking fan fiction right here. Sorry, the feeling you have in your ovaries is not evidence.
Add transformational to the actual price with profits and ROI. How transformational is doing small bullshit tasks for a 2000$/month subscription.
It say something about how useful is it when it is not subsidiced.
The bubble exists be cause no AI company gets any profits and laughable revenue.
Is it 2000$/month useful is the interesting question.
How did you measure this massive value? Please share your methodology and results! Super cool, I am happy for you! Looking forward to the read!
Just stating that someone who disagrees with you isn't reasonable without any argument is what a cunt would do.
My lived experience is that you are a cunt. You are not living it so i guess you would disagree, but you wouldn't know, I am living it!
SF is the world didn't you know. Fucking prick.
Many big words and really impressive you still manage to sound like a child.
Fallacy: Appeal to authority.
How did you measure this "a lot more of my time", please share your results and methodology!
It is not worth it and it is not even that impressive considering the cost.
If you told me that you would spend half a trillion and the best minds on reading the whole internet, then with some statistical innovation try to guess the probable output of an input. The way it works now seems about right, probably a bit disappointing even.
I would also say, it seems cool and you could do that, but why would you? At least when the training is done it is cheap to use right? No!? What the actual fuck!
Wow! Sure seems like the trillion dollar problem LLMs are looking for.
You made me inte a believer, which Church of Altman are you attending this sunday? And can I come?
I have a friend who can't work with an LLM.
1-1. Your move dickhead.
How did you measure this skyrocketed productivity? Please share your results and methodology!
How did you measure this productivity boost? Please share your results and methodology.
How did you measure this productivity gain? Please share your methodology
How did you measure this productivity gain? Please share your methodology.
About the same way you regurgitate Sammy's cum in your mouth.
We do nothing, they call it hallucination to decieve.
Altman simping all over.
Why use a word that you have to redefine the meaning of? The answer is to deceive.
There is no such thing as confidence regarding the actual facts, only confidence in probable output from the input. Factual confidence is impossible with current architecture.
Correct, it is a useless term with the goal to gaslight and antropmorphise a system that predicts the next token.