phzoe
Makes sense.
You're welcome to think that nearly twice as many diskikes were removed as remain is normal. I disagree. Thank you.
What are the motives of people who claim 4 hurricanes each lasting 3 hours MUST BE more important than 3 hurricanes each lasting 4 hours?
The potential damage may actually result more from duration than frequency.
Perhaps it's worth asking if the initial claim is a dirty rhetorical trick?
When it comes to global accumulated cyclone energy, it is no trend/slightly decreasing.
Alarmists predicted it would go up decades ago. They were wrong.
Now they just cherrypick subfacts beneath that grand fact. Look at this location! Look at this time slice! See? See?
It's pathetic.
"And in no way should anyone not go back as far as possible for any datasets including tree rings and other indirect methods of sampling further back in the historical records there."
Great! So you have to reject scant non-global thermometer data prior to the satellite age.
"but that still comprises more data than you have made use of to come to your conclusion!"
No! There is NO more data for atlantic hurricanes. If there was, NOAA would have it.
No scientists have complete data to create an ACE prior to the 1970s.
I made do with what was available and I did a good job.
Scientists claim that peak intensity will go up. Well I have peak low pressure data ...
81m.org tracked other channels. Different behavior.