phobius
https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2019/03/addressing-spotifys-c...
Frankly both sides seem immensely dodgy in their approach - manipulative language, half-truths, blame-shifting
Am very curious whether Spotify in Europe will actually become 30% cheaper to the end user if this goes ahead (or, if Apple's response is to be believed: 45% cheaper after the first year) as their careful "we're doing this for you" messaging says, or it just ends up being a cash grab
(That said, Apple are doing a great job of losing this value prop)
When I've bought Macs they've often been an older model - luxury-pricing-wise that's nothing next to an Alienware or Surface
(aside: wow, Feynman really is the gift that keeps on giving...)
(or @benjojo12 if you're watching... your setup has inspired me, and I want to play)
aside: seems to be a smooth enough lerp between bits so as not to destroy speakers, but might cause a record needle to jump (can anyone more versed weigh in here?)
even if this is unrelated - disconcerting to hear that the unit's usability is so closely tied to online services
Am unfamiliar with Puffin, but the post leaping straight to "it's a conspiracy!" without indicating what the stated rationale for rejection was appears a bit off.
(I'd I'm normally first in line to attribute things to corporate greed)
Person: WHY DID YOU DO THAT?
Computer: BECAUSE YOU ASKED ME TO.
^ cue adolescent nerd frothing at mouth
To the best of my knowledge I haven't updated recently, so they've basically had an auto-update feature sitting dormant for a while.
Nothing fishy here.
However this is only productive if you're not working with (a) compiled code, on a (b) project large enough that compile times are non-negligible
In some build environments, the difference in RAM or CPU is measurable in terms of (literally) hours of wasted time per day :(
Tends not to be a linear progression at all; if the attention of more than a couple researchers is applied to any of these things then they grow very quickly - couple this with improvements in parallel processing power and it becomes quite viable. (see: physically based lighting, rigid body -> full crumple simulation, fluid dynamics, Photoshop's "smart fill", or really any game tech)
Apropos of nothing: Same applies in terms of hardware - what we can do with light field cameras now was science fiction just over a decade ago, but within a couple years of crossing a research tipping point we went from 10x10' camera arrays to <$100 hand-held commercial products.
source: graphics tech and SIGGRAPH nerd for the last 23 years
actually there was an extremely slow build up of this tech, with a sudden and rapid escalation - but between 1908 and 2010 was a very shallow incline :)
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1soorlp
Obviously this topic needs to be treated with extreme care, as assuming innocence would be just as damaging as assuming guilt.
Though it is rather interesting that Appelbaum would receive such similar accusations as Assange - especially given his history of gender advocacy and related activism.
http://12xspiral.com/intro/ http://pholx.com/thenumberswebgrethersspiral/
Supposedly there's also a post of him admitting it was to gain attention - but I've yet to see it.
Here's a google cache: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https:/...
There's a rebuttal from AgileBits: https://blog.agilebits.com/2015/10/19/when-a-leak-isnt-a-lea...