phemoai

The rabbit hole goes even deeper than that:

https://twitter.com/genericeddie/status/1659081857793769472

https://web.archive.org/web/20060115061830/http://www.rollin...

No, it's about protecting women's sex-based rights. Having every point in the declaration enacted in law and policy would abolish no-one.

Men could still claim to be women and present themselves in a feminine manner if they so desire. There's nothing to prevent their freedom of belief and freedom of expression. The difference is that this wouldn't entitle them to access female spaces, and indeed would not grant them any special privileges under the law.

This isn't abolition, just like separation of church and state doesn't abolish religious folks, with them being free to practice their beliefs within their own communities of like-minded people. Same principle should apply to 'gender identity' beliefs.

If you disagree, please cite those parts of the declaration that you believe shows otherwise.

The Declaration on Women's Sex-Based Rights is exactly what it says. That you're framing it as abolishing some other group of people is quite simply incorrect.

Please actually read it yourself rather than biased articles from others complaining about it:

https://www.womensdeclaration.com/en/declaration-womens-sex-...

I would be surprised if you could back up your claim with any excerpts from the text of the declaration itself.