pattycake
Re:UCLA introductory programming classes should focus more on Python, ...
on Friday March 02, 2018 @11:58AM (#16503311)
That kind of defeats the argument of the article then.
Re:California to allow testing of self-driving cars without a driver p...
on Tuesday February 27, 2018 @12:01PM (#16475374)
They're still in development and testing
Re:MIT 6.S094: Deep Learning for Self-Driving Cars
on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @10:25PM (#16174426)
Dang looks like the class already started.
Would it be worth it to formally enroll in the class if you're trying to get into the industry?
Re:Apple scientists disclose self-driving car research
on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @01:17PM (#15759056)
I think you start with a a commercial product, which doesn't exist right now.
Re:Velodyne’s VLS-128 offers more resolution, smaller package, lower p...
on Wednesday November 08, 2017 @08:29PM (#15658948)
> How many of these does one need in a self-driving car?
I think that definitely depends on the company you talk to. Tesla right now says 0. Other companies have been seen with 1-5.
Re:How the LIDAR tech GM just bought probably works
on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @11:43PM (#15547280)
Imagine you are potentially the first autonomous car maker to market. You need to build a car that assumes no other cars can talk to it. The idea you have is good, but is probably a solution that gets addressed much farther down the road.