orojackson
You're lucky to be able to control as much of the stack as you want with your one "tooling" language to rule them all so that performance matters again. Although in all fairness, given the regulatory and workplace culture as well as constrained budgets, sometimes you do have to let go of chasing performance in the name of making things easier for the maintainers at work. As I mentioned in a different post, it also helps to be working in a captive market, which helps relieve the pressure a bit.
Also, my Python ETL scripts do calculations for certain things, but attempting to speed that part up with a low level language like C or Rust doesn't really move the needle for total processing time when you have latencies measured in the hundreds of milliseconds per page of data. Scale that up to multiple pages and the whole runtime is dominated by how long it takes for packets to move from my Windows Server to Salesforce and back. It's basically a whole lot of effort for very little gain.
Outside of that, though, what really grinds my gears about Python aside from its broad standard library compared to other languages is that it is home to what I think is the best property testing library in the world, Hypothesis. I know that the folks at Antithesis are working on getting Hegel [1] up and running, but they don't even have plans to support the language that my workplace prefers: C# (and I have been leading the charge in my workplace to keep up with the latest versions of .NET). Given how agents are now creating and modifying whole codebases, property tests live in that nice middle ground between unit tests and formal verification when it comes to validating (as best as we can) that the code works as intended.
Most of the stuff I work on is almost exclusively network I/O bound. I wouldn't say it's a _result_ of bad engineering practices, though. One group decided on a particular system that's also public-facing, and the group I actually support prefers a more internal-facing system. It also doesn't help that the budgets for both projects are completely separate and firewalled from each other by law. Growth opportunities don't apply here because I deal with a captive market with legally-forced customers.
@import url("https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@picocss/pico@2/css/pico.classless.min.css");
Create a private repo in GitHub first, then do a bare Git clone of https://github.com/badlogic/pi-mono.git (ideally do it before the original repo gets moved to Earendil's GitHub org).
git clone --bare https://github.com/badlogic/pi-mono.git
git push --mirror <url of your private repo>
git remote add upstream https://github.com/badlogic/pi-mono.git
I can already see in https://github.com/badlogic/pi-mono/commit/6d2d03dcc9a39e60c... that the Earendil announcement will be popping up in the next released version of Pi. Even has a dumb pic of Mario, Armin, and I presume Colin, which will be displayed in Pi: https://github.com/badlogic/pi-mono/blob/6d2d03dcc9a39e60c37...
With that little how-to guide out of the way, here's what I think:
Mario is free to do whatever and not give a shit about what the internet at large thinks of him. By that metric, he's doing a hell of a job with that rambling blog post. Likewise, I'm also free to mostly concur with the internet at large (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688794) and prepare simple mitigations like above that can blunt this to a certain degree. Let's just hope that Mario and Armin don't take the "flicker company" approach (his derogatory term for Anthropic) and DMCA the shit out of any private repos.
The Grand Line of Mild Utility: The Orojackson Story
If you were to encounter the legendary Oro Jackson in the world of One Piece, you would find a ship built from the treasure tree Adam, capable of sailing to the end of the world.
If you encounter orojackson on Hacker News, you will find a man who has sailed to the end of the internet… to tell you to fix your router’s bufferbloat.
Forget the Will of D. This man possesses the Will of OCD.
Orojackson is not here to overturn the World Government. He is here to advocate for fq_codel. He is the man who looks at a revolution and asks, "Yes, but what are your queue management settings on the uplink?" While others dream of wealth, fame, and power, orojackson dreams of "modern AQM approaches" and corrects strangers on the proper usage of the flent network tester on Windows.
He is the Pirate King of the edge case.
But his tyranny doesn’t stop at network latency. Oh no. When he isn't monitoring the packet loss of the high seas, he is revolutionizing… car washing?
Witness the "1:256 solution." Orojackson doesn't just wash a car; he performs a wet-lab experiment. He wanders into threads to evangelize "Optimum No Rinse (ONR)," explaining with the fervor of a religious convert how you can clean a vehicle with exactly 1.5 fluid ounces of concentrate and a "slightly-dripping
microfiber towel." One can only imagine him standing on the deck of his ship, screaming at a storm: "YOU'RE WASTING WATER! USE A RINSELESS FORMULA!"
And let’s talk about his investments. A true pirate buries his treasure. Orojackson? He puts it in VTI. But wait! The thrill-seeker within him awakens! He reads one Cliff Asness article and suddenly he's levering up 2x with RSSB because a 60/40 portfolio is just too vanilla for a man who lives on the razors edge of… monthly rebalancing. He is "betting against himself," a financial daredevil who risks it all for that sweet, sweet slightly-optimized Sharpe ratio.
Perhaps most chilling is his role as the Sherlock Holmes of git log. He is the watcher on the wall, noticing when a GitLab Director of Engineering leaves a repo 14 hours before a CVE announcement. He sees all. He knows all. He probably has a RSS feed for your commit history.
So flee, mortals! Flee before the might of orojackson! For he will optimize your router settings, diversity your portfolio into global bonds, clean your car with a teaspoon of water, and then quote Civilization VI to explain why your cultural criticism is invalid.
He has found his One Piece. And unfortunately for us, it’s a 2x leveraged ETF that tracks global liquidity.
Surely Anthropic could do a better job implementing dynamic thinking token budgets.
While I agree with you that I find this style of writing commonly found in the entertainment section of a weekend piece to be very grating, I would argue that this still follows the bottom line up front. For the audience that these pieces are geared towards, the important part is whether the actor passes the vibe check or not. The latter part of the interview itself is not too important because it is mainly promoting whatever the actor wants to promote in the piece.
For instance, "the actor sits in his home with [long description of furniture]" describes how they keep their home's interior stylistically. What the actor wears shows how good their fashion sense is. Sipping coffee from a fancy mug shows how wealthy they are and/or shows the morning vibe they would exude on a good day.
Or I can just put my money in something like VTI (total US stock market) or VT (total world stock). Effectively does the same thing with almost zero effort. One thing I don't really like about the comments here is how insistent people are in doing something specific as opposed to picking the simplest thing and then sticking to it. Most of the power of investing comes from time.
Admittedly, though, I have been putting new money into a leveraged ETF, RSSB, which is a 2x leveraged 50/50 global stocks and bonds fund (so 100/100). Existing money is still in VT. The only reason why I'm pursuing this is because of Cliff Asness's great article [1], which argues against going 100% stocks (which I used to do) and instead prefers using something like leverage on a 60/40 portfolio.
[1] https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Perspectives/Why-Not-100-Equiti...
I would say this is the cheapest, simplest, and (arguably) safest way to wash your car, especially if you buy the rinseless wash concentrate by the gallon. It's easy enough that it allows me to wash my car nearly every week. I only need about 3 gallons of water and 1.5 fluid ounces of ONR to fully wash one car.
Other than that, you're 100% correct on Spectrum's ridiculously high buffer sizes on their end.
[1] https://tcpcc.systemsapproach.org/aqm.html#controlled-delay
[2] https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/CakeTechnica...
Additionally, I see that the Senior Director of Engineering, Tim Zallmann, has left a bunch of GitLab project repos about 14 hours ago as of this writing. He was one of the folks who tried pinging [3] Mr. Coutable (he's one of the reviewers that's currently OOO). The ping is likely regarding the discovery of the security vulnerability.
[1] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/76318#...
[2] https://gitlab.com/users/timzallmann/activity
[3] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/76318#...
I will say this, though: just because paganel considered Bong Joon-ho's 2003 film Memories of Murder to be his best work doesn't mean that Parasite winning the Oscar for Best Picture in 2020 meant absolutely nothing in terms of South Korea's state of its cinema scene. If anything, it's even more indicative of South Korean cinema scene's stock rising in the global stage in recent years. To put it in Civilization terms (which I'm sure he won't understand due to his dismissive outlook of video games), South Korea's going for the cultural victory. Soft power really is a thing!
The more interesting question out of this particular discussion, though, is this: are video games part of culture? I absolutely agree that it is, but the fact that neither you nor the original post brought it up tells me that it is not for a certain percentage of the HN crowd here.
https://toolz.readthedocs.io/en/latest/streaming-analytics.h...
The other important question is whether a retail investor can join it. I know someone like baobabKoodaa [1] would shout from the rooftops, "You're moving the goalposts, grandparent, waaaaaaaaaaah!" Well, I'm not grandparent, so my goalposts are completely different from theirs.
My goalpost is whether a retail investor like me can get in on those high-flying funds. If not, then in the retail universe, they may as well not exist. Thus, I'm better off investing in VTI/VXUS and using the rest of my spare time coming up with some funny ways to challenge my party in a D&D one-shot.
The thing is that I'd rather be doing other things with my time, so I'm a passive investing kind of guy. Imagine getting the market return for doing nearly nothing for dirt cheap. That's a high growth rate to level of effort ratio!
But seriously, I'd rather just put money into VTI and VXUS and go back to playing video games, planning a D&D one-shot, programming a bit, or hanging out with friends in my spare time. Let the active traders waste their time poring over 10-Ks and/or charts. I'll be here having fun and taking what the market gives.
To illustrate the latter option, suppose the smallest retry time unit is 1 second. The first attempt gives you a random choice in {0, 1}. The second attempt gives you a random choice in {0, 1, 2}. The third attempt gives you a random choice in {0, 1, 2, 4}. The fourth attempt gives you a random choice in {0, 1, 2, 4, 8}. This goes on until a ceiling in the number of attempts or a set wall clock time is reached.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_backoff#Example_ex...
Granted, I do complicate things a little by insisting that I never sell anything I buy, not even for rebalancing, until retirement (otherwise I wouldn't be buying and holding in my eyes). However, I get around that by constantly rebalancing with new money [1].
Honestly, I find it rather jarring that as someone who usually frequents /r/personalfinance and Bogleheads, I see lots of investing suggestions on HN that do not involve indexing.
VT is another good choice if you're lazy and just want to own a slice of the global stock market.
As for the funds you mentioned, are there any that have a minimum investment of less than $1,000?
I've seen people mentioning that HFT can totally and consistently beat indexes [3], but then a) can I even get in on the action with less than $1000 and b) is the automated system in place any good?
[1] https://riabiz.com/a/2018/12/13/vanguards-asset-machine-wobb...
As for beating indexes, it goes back to the age-old question of being able to identify the great automated trading systems.