optionalsquid
optionalsquid on Hacker News
It looks like 18 of the 30 issues listed in table 4 had already been fixed when that paper was released, and there is activity in most of the rest. One was recently flagged as being fixed by -Znext-solver, and another has the submitter write that it is fixed, but the issue is not closed. And that's before you consider the impact of the individual issues; how many of the remaining issues impact "real" code?
So I don't think it's fair to claim that "no-one cared".
Putting aside whether or not being an "associate member" counts as being "half in" the EU, of which there were already examples during Brexit, it should not be forgotten that the UK did not want to be "half in" the EU. The people who wanted to remain in the EU probably did want to stay "half in", but they did not set the agenda, so what the UK got was a hard exit
I'm not so sure that the argument that some humans will survive would placate anyone who is worried about a catastrophic outcome from AI development. You could make the same argument for climate collapse or global nuclear war, but I also don't think that's gonna make anyone feel better about those scenarios
While a Steam account is supposed to be personal and non-transferable, it obviously isn't so in practice. So unless you provide additional information to prove that the owner is still the same person, then it is probably not sufficient to prove the current owner's age.
Looking at the "marketplace" G2A, about 15% of the Steam games sold there are sold in the form of accounts: Instead of a key or a gift, you get a login and a password for an account owning the game being sold. Making the account age a form of identification would no doubt also create a market for aged accounts without games.
That was conclusively disproven by Schwarzenegger et al., 1994.
How does memory usage compare between your two runs?
The benchmarks report 687M for their run of zstd, and 12178M and 18301M for the two runs of BZip3. Which itself is a bit eyebrow raising
> The only advantage of uv is to have support for parallel async extraction. If pip extracted multiple files/wheels in parallel without being blocked by the GIL, pip could easily match or outcompete uv.
That sounds like it would be relatively easy to demonstrate: You could tweak uv to perform downloads/extractions sequentially and then compare its runtime with pip. Has any such comparison been done?
That study suggests that 65% of autistic individuals are undiagnosed. The 90% is only for middle-aged and older.
Skimming a couple (due to time constraints) of the sources mentioned in the study, one source [1] mention that "3 in 10 autistic people of working age are in employment", and the other [2] that "approximately 50% fail to achieve independence in their living status, employment, and close relationships"
It doesn't seem to support the claim that "90% of autistics are undiagnosed and work".
[1] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-buckland-revi...
[2] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10803-020-04763-2
There is no "next step" in evolution, nor any concern for what is or is not "detrimental for us as a spieces".
Evolution is much simpler, at its core: Is autism heritable and do autistic people leave behind more viable offspring than the non-autistic? Then the proportion of autistic people can be expected to grow, otherwise it most likely won't
Is that flip-flopping or just different developers having different preferences? Those who complain now would have had no reason to complain back then, and vice versa
What do you mean that it ruins integrity?
Practically speaking, most people probably won't know how to undo the watermark. Especially when the suggested method is to run the text through a local model
I use YNAB4 to this day and the cross-device sync still works
> In it, I learned that there's some interesting quirks about the way the traditional shaXsum tools work, specifically that they focus on a set of inputs from the shell command line, which means that you can exhaust the shell command line length fairly easily (try hashing every file in the Linux source tree, for instance; zsh, bash, and fish will all eventually tell you "Fuck off, there's too many characters in argv")
Did you try to run something like
sha256sum **/*.*
Because if so, then you'll of course exceed the maximum number of arguments. That applies to all command-line tools that take an unbounded number of arguments.
A simple solution is to use find, which handles that for you:
find -type f -exec sha256sum "{}" "+" # 1.4s on my system for Linux 7.1.5
Alternatively, you can combine find with xargs (or parallel), which also handles it and optionally allows you to specify exactly how many arguments to process per call (-n), and how many commands to run in parallel (-P):
find -type f -print0 | xargs --null -P 8 -n 512 sha256sum # 0.3s
The exact same argument could be made in Moonshot's favor.
Being a bit tongue in cheek, one could also argue that by releasing their models, Moonshot is contributing much more value than Anthrophic. Did Prometheus not create an immense amount of value, when he took fire from the hands of the Gods and gave it to humans?
I'm not sure I understand how that that would make a material difference. The company might not know who submitted each sample, but the company would still have their entire genomes in their possession. That is no different, than if somebody obtained the data from a biobank. The data in biobanks is normally also anonymized, insofar that you can anonymize whole-genome DNA data
That's a kit for sample collection. You would then ship off your sample to the company in question, and they would do the actual sequencing, and then send the DNA data and genetic variants they've inferred back to you. I think that defeats what the article author is trying to accomplish, since you still share your entire genome with a third party.
The actual instruments used by that company are a whole lot more expensive, and you have to buy reagents as well: https://www.machinio.com/illumina/dna-sequencers
> Most genomic studies begin by asking participants to upload one of the most identifying and irrevocable pieces of data they own, their DNA.
I'm curious what the author means by "asking participants to upload ... their DNA", because I am not aware of any study that asked participants to do that.
I doubt that my list would be of much use to you, since a lot of the sites relate to specific hobbies.
However, as eloisius mentioned, you can view the most commonly blocked sites. Going through that list is a good start: https://kagi.com/stats?stat=insights
Yeah, it's become quite noticeable. The amount of clearly LLM generated sites that I've blocked just keeps going up and up. The only advantage Kagi has in that regard is that blocks are account wide, regardless of what device you use
It probably depends on your country, and what you are looking for exactly, but it works fine for my needs
> It would almost be like it wasn't really built with audio books in mind, but was rather designed around music.
If Jellyfin was designed around music, then I would expect it to support gap-less playback out of the box. Albums where each track seamlessly transitions into the next are not that rare
The rejection of Opus Magnum got a lot of attention at the time, which probably caused GOG to reconsider. But most developers don't get that kind of attention, if a game of theirs is rejected. I've seen multiple developers of games that I like, saying that they've given up on GOG because of the curation
My understanding is that GOG is not necessarily undesirable, but they are very selective: Unlike Steam or Itch, you have to convince them that it's worth their while to sell your game. And their choices of what (not) to sell are not infrequently baffling. Lots of developers have gotten burned by that, including Zachtronics
Yes, it's unfortunate that the Lancet is not an Open Access journal. But, as you say, you can just purchase the paper if you wish to read it