onecomment1
Re:Detecting LLM-Generated Texts with “Classical” Machine Learning
on Thursday July 16, 2026 @04:16PM (#48939647)
This sounds like it was edited by an llm.
Re:GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produces proof of the Cycle Double Cover Conjectu...
on Friday July 10, 2026 @10:33PM (#48868085)
Thank you for taking the time to respond thoroughly. You made me reflect upon my frustrations and anger. I take back my flagrant comment.
Re:GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produces proof of the Cycle Double Cover Conjectu...
on Friday July 10, 2026 @10:10PM (#48867898)
Materialization of software?
Re:GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produces proof of the Cycle Double Cover Conjectu...
on Friday July 10, 2026 @10:09PM (#48867894)
I agree. We have a coordination problem, and the way our AI lords are proposing to solve this, is by cutting humans out of the equation
Re:GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produces proof of the Cycle Double Cover Conjectu...
on Friday July 10, 2026 @10:07PM (#48867878)
I don’t care if AI solves the collatz conjecture either, why should I?
If, after stealing all human knowledge, spending $1T+ on compute, hiring the best in the world while also stalling progress in other fields by pulling funding from fundamental research is a bunch of lousy math proofs then thats terrible trade. There is an opportunity cost here.
I don’t have anything against AI, and I do think it will progress a lot just like all other human endeavors. But this doomer permanent underclass humans are worthless myopic view of AI is not where its at
Re:GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produces proof of the Cycle Double Cover Conjectu...
on Friday July 10, 2026 @08:50PM (#48867325)
[flagged]