News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

oispakaljaa

More like your sheep didn't "go rogue", they just jumped over your sad little fence.
Re:A map of torii around the world on Saturday February 22, 2025 @03:58PM (#43143146)
What a disappointment, I was expecting a map of toruses around the world
Re:How about trailing commas in SQL? on Tuesday February 11, 2025 @05:18AM (#43011050)
As mentioned in TFA.
Re:What We Learned from a Year of Building with LLMs on Wednesday May 29, 2024 @04:02AM (#40509587)
Line must go up.
Re:Blaze: A High Performance C++ Math Library on Wednesday April 17, 2024 @08:56AM (#40063954)
According to the provided benchmarks [1], it seems to be quite a bit faster.

[1] https://bitbucket.org/blaze-lib/blaze/wiki/Benchmarks

Re:The Eval Game on Thursday December 07, 2023 @10:18AM (#38557295)
Got stuck in Rule 5. Why does this not count as defining my own print function?

  42 + sum(print(0) for print in [lambda x: x])
> P. S. When studying Haskell on a CS course in school, I used to define exactly the same squiggly arrow operator for my programs :-)

Haskell base already has the reverse application operator (&) which does the same thing. Not included in the prelude but can be imported from Data.Function. [1] It's defined as:

  (&) :: a -> (a -> b) -> b
  x & f = f x
Not that there's anything wrong with using your own definitions, just thought I'd point it out!

[1] https://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.18.1.0/docs/Data-...

I identify as a lurker although I've made occasional posts and comments. I don't see how the mods are the problem here. Third part apps go, I go. It's that simple.