nzseth
Re:Mattermost: Open-source, on-premises, Slack alternative
on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @06:08AM (#9770630)
Why would that be a problem?
Re:First results from psychology’s largest reproducibility test
on Friday May 01, 2015 @04:07PM (#9474161)
There seems to be two factors at play here that are creating almost nonsensical results.
1. The results, when filtered through the replicability guidelines rendered a clear verdict - 61 to 39 against.
2. The question of "how closely did the findings resemble the original study?" flips the findings. Moderately similar findings are the majority - 58 to 42 in the other direction.
How can you have a study that has "virtually identical" findings that doesn't replicate the original?