News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

nuclearnicer

Re:Linear algebra done right on Monday August 17, 2026 @03:58AM (#49327689)
Something else you recommend?
Fascinating. Sort of an interesting experiment between the last freshman of no grades and the first with grades.
Re:Google Search Is Dying. What Comes Next Is Worse on Tuesday August 11, 2026 @08:57AM (#49257570)
Yeah, I readily concede it's lesser. For me it was the moment that we stopped watching a particular thing and discussing it the next day. But maybe that's more personal biography than sociology.
Re:Google Search Is Dying. What Comes Next Is Worse on Tuesday August 11, 2026 @08:48AM (#49257449)
Another good one.

My impression of the VCR is not too many people managed to use it for DVR-style rescheduling live TV. Although it did have that feature. We mainly used it to watch movies that we had already been in the theater.

But, for sure, another fracturing. We weren't all talking about the nine movies in the theaters, but whatever we had rented and watched on tape instead.

Re:Google Search Is Dying. What Comes Next Is Worse on Tuesday August 11, 2026 @08:45AM (#49257411)
Good point! Interested to hear about the RoW. Where are you from? Was there pre-custom search results fracturing or did you have a (relatively) uniform national media before that?
Re:Google Search Is Dying. What Comes Next Is Worse on Tuesday August 11, 2026 @08:27AM (#49257203)
It is an astute point. I agree that we have largely lost a lot of our shared reality. But as with any "beginning" of a long, diffuse process, people might quibble about the specifics.

I offer a few other moments you might gesture toward as the beginning of the end of shared reality.

First, 1987, with the elimination of the Fairness Doctrine and the subsequent boom in partisan talk radio shows.

Second, 1989, when cable TV became a mature technology reaching half of U.S. households.

And finally, maybe a lesser item, the introduction of the DVR circa 2000, when we stopped watching scheduled TV together.

I wonder if more historically informed people would find the fracturing going further back as other advancements in publishing technology allowed more people to share more views.

Great story.

I don't think you need to feel like a piece of shit for your brief defense of the student. Erasing and replacing the answer is unusual. As is photocopying all the tests.

Asking someone for an explanation of an unusual circumstance is perfectly natural. Perhaps TA#2 should feel like a piece of shit for her lousy explanation!

Re:Introduction to Computer Music [pdf] on Sunday April 05, 2026 @11:53AM (#47650681)
Indeed it described an output and was also a UI. I meant that describing the output could be the UI. I pictured a textbox or a whisper-style text to speech session. Basically an ai chatbot specialized for generating music.

I couldn't figure out precisely what that video showed, but it was fascinating. Somehow it reminded me of the orca music programming environment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r28Xy-1_F8I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tAAsolMG-M

Re:Introduction to Computer Music [pdf] on Saturday April 04, 2026 @10:54PM (#47645723)
Wonderful question. I suspect it's partially the culture issue you point to, but also a practical issue of composition. If we decompose sound into the basic waveforms, similar to the subject pdf on page 18, we then have parts that we can reassemble. We can take the defense-funded DSP math of the likes of a John Cooley or a John Tukey and build an engine for assembling the parts of sound.

All this being said, I think that's a process of convenience and a historical path not a absolute constraint. We have some more flexible means of communicating with the machines today. And I strongly encourage someone to work on a new UI for computer music. "Jazz trio piano, upright bass, and drums. start drummer laid-back, piano blowing over the changes, then piano on top."

It looks like the top 10% from 6th to 8th grade Society of Science fairs are invited to participate. They are then selected down to a top 300[1] and a top 30.[2] You can find a project name for the top 300 and a paragraph on each of the top 30.

[1] https://www.societyforscience.org/jic/2025-top-300-junior-in... [2] https://www.societyforscience.org/jic/2025-finalists/

Re:Has the cost of building software just dropped 90%? on Monday December 08, 2025 @05:59PM (#46198859)
This is great. Asking questions of library code is a big pattern of mine too.

Here's an example I saw on twitter. Asking an LLM to document a protocol from the codebase:

https://ampcode.com/threads/T-f02e59f8-e474-493d-9558-11fddf...

Do you think you will be able to capture any of this extra value? I think I'm faster at coding, but the overall corporate project timeline feels about the same. I feel more relaxed and confident that the work can be done. Not sure how to get a raise out of this.