News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

npelly

Re:Ask HN: Who is hiring? (April 2018) on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @11:36AM (#16745658)
Zoox (Autonomous Mobility) | Foster City, CA | Generalist SWE | Infra Software Engineers | Android Engineers | Front-end Engineers | Full-time | ONSITE | VISA

Zoox is building a fleet of autonomous vehicles.

Zoox is hiring across a range of roles - from Manufacturing Engineers to Machine Learning experts. See https://jobs.lever.co/zoox for the full menu.

I am hiring manager for teams needing Generalist SWEs, Infra Software Engineers, Android Engineers & Front-end Engineers. For these roles you can contact me direct at npelly(at)zoox.com.

A lot of comments suggesting this is cynical compensation arbitrage by the DeepMap founders. I don't buy it.

I expect a startup was the only option to execute on the idea with a decent level of autonomy. Google/Alphabet already have well established teams in the areas of mapping & autonomous driving so you can't just go ahead and start your own multi-engineer effort.

Would love to read the 80 page white paper mentioned in the article.
Re:Facebook's female engineers claim gender bias on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @01:02AM (#14253183)
It's not that hard.

Hiring managers / hiring committees for technical positions at the big-5 are made up of peer engineers and managers (not recruiters or executives). So they hire the best person for the job because they're likely to be working alongside.

I haven't come across situations where there are direct diversity incentives at the point where the hiring decision is made. Sure, there's probably indirect incentives, but I don't think they're as strong as your suggesting.

Re:Facebook's female engineers claim gender bias on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @07:41PM (#14251744)
I've never seen suggestions that Facebook has a lower hiring bar for females, and i'd be really surprised if this was the case.

The playbook is to aggressively attract female (and other diversity) candidates into the top of the hiring funnel, but keep the hiring bar equal.

Source - I used to be a hiring manager at a similar large-cap tech company.

Re:Developer Preview of Android O on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @10:57PM (#13928167)
Agree. Driver abstraction layers are not a cure-all. First, OEMs want to customize the O/S above the driver level. Second, a strict DAL with a canonical O/S on top slows hardware innovation. All devices end up functionally the same because they have to fit the same DAL, and they can't customize the O/S to take advantage of new HW.

Take Android Wear. It took the DAL approach. As a result, O/S upgrades are immediately available to all devices (awesome!). But there is very little differentiation - all Wear devices use the same small set of SoC's and peripherals, and are functionally the same. Google decides on HW innovations.

(This was true of Wear 1.0, not sure if changed with Wear 2.0)

Re:Software Engineering at Google on Saturday February 11, 2017 @02:51AM (#13621640)
They would be far too easy to game.