noptd
Perhaps you should do more research before ending a comment on such a condescending remark next time.
>It’s important to note that artificial food colors do not cause ADHD.8 One study found that removing artificial food colors from the diet had a statistically significant effect on ADHD symptoms, however. The authors noted that the improvements were modest but still statistically significant.9
Be ready for an expansion of their fear-mongering ad campaigns about how anyone in your office or home can read your messages when you send them unencrypted.
More like a thought-terminating false dichotomy that only serves to quash healthy discussion.
Let's leave these "jokes" on Reddit or Twitter where they belong please.
Hard disagree, unless you have some citations to back this up.
I'd love to see some sources that support such a strong claim. Otherwise, it just comes off as bait for argument.
As should you since flamebait isn't conducive to good conversation.
What a ridiculous take. Helping people build the skills needed to defend from being bullied is nothing like victim blaming, at all.
When you're making sweeping generalizations and arguing in near absolutes, citations are very much needed.
Right, because the results of the previous studies amount to evidence that is too weak to conclude that red meat is inherently unhealthy to consume. I'm not sure how your comment contradicts this.
I think you nailed it. In my experience, the increase in complexity isn't necessarily inherent to the amount of code so much as the amount of abstraction used as code size increases.
I've worked on some large codebases that only used simple, well-understood and/or well-documented abstractions which didn't feel as nearly complex as other codebases with abstractions that were more complicated than they were worth.
Generally speaking, they absolutely do. Even in scenarios where an entire org is being cut, star performers will be reassigned to other areas of the company beforehand.
It may sound brash but it'd take either a major failure in management or a failure in reputation-building and visibility for a star performer to be cut during these types of layoffs. That's not to say that good or even great engineers aren't at risk, but you're not going to find "10x-ers" being let go.
If Microsoft has their way, you mean.
Not exactly. Unless 100% of workers are only working 4 day work weeks, it's impossible to account for the confounding variable of other workers picking up the slack when analyzing these trends from a macro view.
"Oh, you disabled Bluetooth and left it that way? Well, we know better so we're going to turn it back on without your knowledge or approval. You're welcome."
I don't buy the convenience excuse either otherwise the behavior could be disabled if desired.
>I've hired hundreds of developers over three decades, and this is completely wrong
in order to argue from a position of authoritative experience, these questions are entirely fair game.
Please, do share.
I'd imagine it be an ultimatum - if you enforce another country's laws on our citizens then you're also in violation of our local laws and will be fined, unable to operate in our country, etc