nathanmills

[flagged]

Then why is it whenever I watch someone use their computer they always accept cookies?

They're doing it because of a preceived result, not an actual result.

Sounds like your projecting a bit.

They seem pretty human to me.

I don't see many people upset at Stripe over this, I certainly am not.

No, vagueness gets me much more upset, but there's just nothing to write about in those cases.

If you never give it back, then there can't be any more rage from turning it off.

Bias is usually the result of something, yes, but it's still bias.

Then what is it?

You must be a child.

Wow, that means 13 minutes ago must've been the first time they've ever used the site

The fact we have no clue how it works or why it happens just proves that they are plain lying

Whenever I throw slurs at them they just refuse to respond

Not actually possible though. Humans have constraints.

Yeah buddy dude I read it. Thats just not possible.

Downdooters, explain how TIME TRAVEL is actually HECKIN' REAL

He would've just gambled it all anyway.

Yeah no this is fake

You are Evil.

They are medium-sized at best, and 2 of them is not hostile. I doubt they chose them by choice, its just a page template where it makes since to have one at both the top and bottom for longer pages. TWO DUMBASS, TWO FUCKING BUTTONS, THATS IT.

I don't remember that being there, maybe it was edited. But 2 buttons are not "aggressive". C'mon. Really dude? You believe that shit?

Downdooters, what about my question did you dislike? Is it just you don't want any resistence to anything you say?

WebUSB next? I would like to be able to configure my keyboard but it can only be done via their website which requires WebUSB.

What makes it aggressive?

Women.

Not pulled, just no new purchases on Steam. Existing owners like yourself can still use it and get updates: https://store.steampowered.com/app/252950/Rocket_League/

It works on Linux with Proton.

LOL

No, I will not send you malware. This scenario is about post-hacked where the malware is removed, but the attacker still has the cookies they collected. There should be a way to invalidate those cookies, just like how you can change your password if they got your password.

If you want, however, we can simulate the scenario. Find your JWT token, change your password (commonly invalidates tokens aswell), and then post it here post-invalidation. If it works still, then thats the issue. Though, changing your password commonly requires your current password and not just a cookie, so I wouldn't be able to do that. But I could probably change your username as proof. If it doesn't work, then it was checked against some revocation database that the article talks about, where at that point, where you have you check a database anyway, you might as well just store the session on the server, since the JWT is no longer stateless and provides no advantage over typical sessions.

That's such a Reddit comment!