najajomo
Modded into invisibility, looks like you violated one of the sacred tenets of Hacker News :)
To whomever modded down the above, care to offer a reason as to what you find objectionable in that statement. Personally I don't need other people to censor posts on this here forum. I am quite capable of making up my own mind as to the veracity of such statements.
edit: Censorship practised on Hacker News
I'm sick of the censorship practised here through the use of the modding system to render certain comments invisible. Yet another self confirming echo chamber on the Intertubes. So long and thanks for all the fish :)
I don't agree with that statement and can't refute it, but I'm going to mod it down into oblivion anyway ;)
Silence, I kill you !!!
I am in total agreement .. I couldn't help notice, but all these articles are written in a style so similar they could have been produced by the same author or group of authors. Nothing wrong with this kind of prose style in a long form novel, but it does take this reader time and energy to get to the point and doesn't belong in reportage.
You contradicted me so I am going to vote you down :(
reply
Well put, I wonder would the signers be so vocal in support if he were a fundamentalist Christian that opposed abortion and gay marriage?
@ritzw: "The possibility of preemptive nuclear strike is still looms. There is also the possibility that the person with their finger on the metaphorical button is not all there, and maybe shouldn't have that power. There is a movement to remove the ability for the president to call preemptive strikes. There is also a movement to remove ICBMs from the Triad. If enemies launch toward the US, an ICBM counter attack launch only allows a 6 minute window. (Assuming they targeted our ICBMs.) A side note: Military doesn't man the ICBMs. They are controlled by civilians. This is by design because the past administrations didn't trust the military to control ICBMs. The fear that they would use them without hesitation was too great. Nuclear attack subs would pick up the slack and don't require the 6 minute response window. This would greatly reduce the currently great risk of thermonuclear war we live under."
http://www.ofrf.org/news/weeds-your-way-%E2%80%93-organic-fa...
They've even downvoted that comment :)
Wow, you actually know what your management goals are, instead of having to find out by reading in the trade papers that the company is now totally X Y Z focused, X Y and Z being whatever the tech flavour of the month is :)
I assume the use of 'scaffolding' here, means an average programmer who through personal skills, raises the performance of the whole team.
Why the need to insert anti Mac FUD into a technical article?
"via a pico driver with Microsoft’s clean room implementation of the Linux syscall interface."
Why clean room it, the kernel is GPL after all. This whole Linux-on-Windows strategy is nothing more than a ploy to slow down Linux adoption. Provide enough features to call it Linux without being actually being useful.
"The battle we are fighting is over who controls the next generation applications and system architecture, APIs and services" Shirish Nadkarni 1991
http://edge-op.org/iowa/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/0000...
Because the ruskies aren't dumb enough to keep their secrets on a computer connected to the Internet.
Because the Chinese aren't dumb enough to keep their secrets on a computer in Baghdad that someone can walk in and burn the files to a writeable DVD.