News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

nabogh

Re:UUIDv7 doesn't have the properties you think it does on Sunday October 25, 2026 @08:01PM (#50237283)
I'm in that thread trying to PR or take over the package :')

I actually had a zoom meeting with the guy who made it. He seems like a nice guy but yeah not a good situation.

I think my PR even got merged but a release never got made.

Any numbers on exactly how much safer the average user will be? How many scams are we stopping here? I don't know anybody outside of technical people who install apps outside the playstore. And what can a malicious app do exactly? They're sandboxed
Re:Postmortem: TanStack npm supply-chain compromise on Monday May 11, 2026 @10:43PM (#48103598)
Some sort of middle ground should have been found where the unpublished package is still accessible as an archive or something. I'd much rather get my package broken than get hacked
Re:SDF Public Access Unix System on Monday April 20, 2026 @03:29AM (#47831325)
Definitely wait at least a few months if you've not already. There are legal risks with these kinds of things and some orgs move slowly.
"Like the team that decided I need to pay $150 a year to sign software to put in the app store, or whatever jerk put RFID tags on the water filters in my fridge like a sort of drinking rights management. Good technologists should be interested in cryptography and the power it brings, but also be careful about what they might set into motion."
Re:Google just gave Android power users a sideloading win on Sunday March 29, 2026 @12:52AM (#47560487)
> Google's latest concession makes the sideloading controversy a big nothingburger.

It's really not. Try to realise that it's not meant to be Google's phone and they shouldn't be "letting" me do things

Re:Ask HN: Could you share your personal website here? on Thursday January 15, 2026 @01:58AM (#46629035)
I'd recommend making sure your site is in Marginala's index. E.g. here's how I confirm my site is in there:

https://marginalia-search.com/site/nhobb.com?view=info

And link to sites you like!

Re:Things I learnt about passkeys when building passkeybot on Monday December 22, 2025 @08:09PM (#46361265)
I agree with you but the whole thing makes me uncomfortable. We're definitely making it easier for these security conscious companies to do vendor lock in if we encourage passkey use.
Re:Chernobyl: Debunking the Myths of the HBO Series on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @09:33PM (#45988171)
Hey Omar! I met you briefly in Grenoble many years ago. I hope you're doing well.

I only recently watched this series and found it very entertaining. But I never expected it to be very accurate. It's definitely been dramatized for TV. I definitely didn't get an anti-nuclear sentiment from the show, I mostly think they were trying to portray a negative view of Soviet Bureaucracy.

Re:De-Googling TOTP Authenticator Codes on Tuesday September 02, 2025 @03:45AM (#45100205)
I actually write down the secret for all my totp codes in a notebook as a backup
Yep I have been in one group for years then in the last month I start getting spam emails from comments on the group
We need another os in the market. A duopoly just isn't competitive enough. Too bad the cost of entry is so high.
Yeah if this goes ahead I'm going back to my feature phone
Re:Google Pixels are no longer the AOSP reference device on Thursday June 12, 2025 @07:01PM (#44264118)
Okay so we just need another company to release a nice phone and release the device tree right?
Re:AOSP project is coming to an end on Thursday June 12, 2025 @06:09AM (#44255859)
That's awful. I bought a pixel because the ecosystem around alternative android roms was healthy. This seems to change that.

Why can't I just get a general purpose computer in my pocket? Why is everything so hostile? I am willing to pay!

Re:An Update on Mozilla's Terms of Use for Firefox on Saturday March 01, 2025 @02:36AM (#43216914)
I was under the impression that selling anonymised data would also fall under this category. Either way we need more transparency here.
Re:"No, we are absolutely not prepared to [fork Firefox]" on Friday February 28, 2025 @04:36PM (#43211571)
Dumb question but why /do/ browsers move quick? Surely we are nearing feature complete. Is it just the complexity of the task? I'm sure there are lots of awful bugs.
Re:A mouseless tale: trying for a keyboard-driven desktop on Saturday February 01, 2025 @09:16PM (#42904988)
I just want to say thank you for mentioning qutebrowser. I'd never heard of it before and I'm now hooked.
Re:Windows 10 begins one-year countdown to end of support on Wednesday October 16, 2024 @09:38AM (#41858920)
What do you mean? Are they going to officially launch it or something? I'm running steam os on my desktop right now.
Re:Ask HN: How do you work as a tech lead? on Monday August 19, 2024 @11:25PM (#41296464)
It's nice to chat to real people for 15 minutes sometimes? Such a short meeting shouldn't feel very disruptive.
Re:Run CUDA, unmodified, on AMD GPUs on Monday July 15, 2024 @07:59PM (#40972543)
I've written a bit of CUDA before. If I want to go pretty bare-bones, what's the equivalent setup for writing code for my AMD card?
Re:Mysterious Drones Swarmed Langley AFB for Weeks on Monday March 18, 2024 @02:50AM (#39741029)
I think this might be considered disposable by military prices. Missiles, torpedoes etc are very expensive
Re:It's Time to Give Up on Email on Monday March 04, 2024 @10:55PM (#39599235)
We still need to receive the mail somehow. It's analogous to the post of yesteryear.

The issue seems to me that marketing loves to abuse dark patterns and whatnot to sign most people up for a torrent of emails. My partner has thousands of unread emails and most regular people I know would be in a similar boat. We can't expect people to keep an inbox zero level of diligence.

Maybe some better legislation around unsolicited advertisements is needed? I don't want to have to unsubscribe. Don't sign me up in the first place.

Re:Kagi Sidekick (alpha) on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @07:52PM (#39448945)
Of course I understand that it's not my money. Weirdly hostile comment.

I'm just expressing that the value wasn't quite there for myself. And these projects kept coming out so I wondered if they were the reason for the higher prices.

Re:Kagi Sidekick (alpha) on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @07:50PM (#39448921)
Yeah like it's fine. I just felt the value wasn't quite there for me personally and I found a few too many projects coming out that didn't benefit me. So I cancelled. No harm done in the end, just a little sad nothing is filling my personal niche of the market.
Re:Kagi Sidekick (alpha) on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @05:52PM (#39448044)
I cancelled my Kagi subscription because it's a little too expensive for me in the unlimited search tier. And I search too much for the limited search tier.

I can't help but wonder if my money was being spent on pet projects like this instead of improving/maintaining the search.

Re:Nitter.net Has Disappeared on Sunday January 14, 2024 @04:59AM (#38989041)
Please don't just vaguely say you're pretty sure of something because of a half remembered fact
They're trying to avoid repurcussions from saying something their employer doesn't endorse
Re:A.I. Belongs to the Capitalists Now on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @10:36PM (#38388934)
How so? GNU licensed software cannot be built on by large companies without them publishing the source code. You think they want that?
From Wikipedia:

>In November 2018, SoftBank acquired a warrant to buy up to $3 billion worth of shares in the company by the end of September 2019 at a $42 billion valuation.

Valuation comes from how much stake you buy blown out as if the rest of the shares cost that much. This naturally doesn't make a lot of sense because the price would go up as you bought the rest of the shares. Still the valuation is ball park correct it was just a complete cock-up on the buyers part.

Older »