mxhwll

Change rarely works, it's the new companies that use AI in these sorts of areas that will show it works and then everyone will follow.

Time will show you are right and almost all the other dumbasses here at HN are wrong. Which is hardly surprising since they are incapable of applying themselves around their coming replacement.

They are 100% engineers and 100% engineers have no ability to adapt to other professions. Coding is dead, if you think otherwise then I hope you are right! But I doubt it because so far I have only heard arguments to the counter that are obviously wrong and retarded.

Spoken like someone who has never contributed to open source but just grandstands about how everyone else needs to.

This is why you don’t make your own cross platform toolkit.

Great question jotaen. For our ITN we do indeed require the open source to be in a package manager. We support 6 package managers at launch including npm, pypi, gem, brew and apt.

We intend to aggressively expand this (I have soft spot for Swift) but also have plans for eventually decentralizing this properly relying only on release tarballs that can be signed proving attachment to the wallets registered with the tea protocol.

I'm fully aware just how much amazing open source is outside package managers but we really believe in doing this problem well and that also meant limiting ourselves at the outset to established and reputable third party data.