mx-e

How on earth can „proprietary software“ with „AI“ in it be admitted as evidence in court ? Are there any third party studies conducted, to test the error rate of the system ? What’s the algorithm actually doing and what gets annotated by humans?

„Move fast and break things“ shouldn’t be the motto when jailing people. This might be pseudoscience payed with tax money!

The point to real minimalism isn't throwing perfectly good stuff out, but not buying unnecessary stuff in the first place. Everything else is just a fad.

So after throwing everything out, people now buy new stuff ? Great trick, great for the planet, slow clap!

If the EU keeps the current Emission Trading Scheme the European plants will soon be retired. They are already becoming unprofitable due to high prices for certificates. See:

https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/new-eu-climate-proposal...

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/corporate-finance/risi...

Its at least misleading, if not downright calculated, to switch back and forth between the top 5% of plants and the top 10. The top 5% represents at least an order of magnitude more than that.

Second, CSS has never worked to date and probably won't work for at least the medium term - meaning we cannot solve the current climate crisis with it.

https://theconversation.com/its-time-to-accept-carbon-captur...

Which leads to the conclusion that cutting electrical CO2 emissions which account for about 25% percent of total emissions by 30% won't cut it in the least. Also we'd then have built gas-fired power plants with a lifetime of 30+ years, when really we need carbon neutrality by 2050.