muskstinks
But it would be so much better if the person behind this would have more character.
Whats your source?
Thats not a lot of people.
And with the satelites risk and disruption to astronomy and the co2 usage, it might have affected more people negativly than positivly.
NASA also another 6 Billion upfront to SpaceX for Dragon and HLS.
So yes the american paid for the R&D of SpaceX.
SpaceX took the 'risk' but either succeeding or not in your main business is hardly a risk if you need to succeed anyway to have that business.
Transportships even reduce speed to reduce costs.
If the payload doesn't pay for all of this, it was a huge R&D investmen from the american people to Musks scifi ideas
If this doesn't play out to be reducing costs for the avg american, Musk was able to get funded by the american tax payer nicely.
Time will show, plenty of ignorant decisions from Musk inbetween so yeah...
Nonetheless even in rural areas there is A LOT of coverage.
And starlink has one sig issue: its bandwidth.
For them to increase bandwdith they need to scale which is expensive and they have to reinvest every 5 years in replacing these satelites.
A fiber layed down can work for a lot longer and can be replaced a lot easier.
And we are talking about AI Datacenters, they are a lot less latency dependend than websites.
Alone the idea that Musk would be able to break through any burocrazy for space stuff and sets up a supply chain for everything space is easier than just setting up some energy and fiber, feels ridicoulys
A star link server has 5 years.
Setting up a terrestrial network is already done and it was relativly easy because you build it up from most profitable to lowest profitable.
Star link only serves 9/10 Million people right now with already 10k satelites whith only a lifetime of 5 years and if this market is profitable, the margins will go down sign due to other competitors. Which are already working on it.
To this, they need humans operating the space side, the base station, they need base stations etc.
It is affected by weather as well.
Its not a 'no-brainer' and while space x showed its somehow a business, amazon and others are entering this space now too. So they never had a first mover financial advantage making big bucks and others are coming which will drive customer base and margin down.
And data center in orbit is not just a pipe dream, its stupid on a whole new level. Smart would have been to build like a DC City in the middle of the USA were its super cheap and introducing the necessary infrastructure to it. But alone the R&D, the sending it up there, solving hard space problems just to not being able to touch hardware when it fails, man thats stupidity on a whole new level.
And come on 100/10 is not bad despite the other 10gig fiber
In texas there is a cap at $11.700 which will be $2k. Plenty of money left on the father side to provide better to the child.
And if you don't agree on the bias thing, how about you also bring up anything which supports your argument? Thats how an argument works.
Also you do know that there are 80% single mothers vs. 20% single fathers? 1970 it was btw. only 1%
If a man doesn't want to care for a kid, he doesn't has to while a mother has to. which elads to a wider spectrum of woman having to care for a kid.
Funny enough, i can't ven find a proper source for kids growing up better with a single father.
But i found this: "Children in single-father families exhibit worse behavior, and are slightly disadvantaged in terms of cognitive skills compared with children living with a single mother (Downey, Ainsworth-Darnell, and Dufur 1998)."
I let people do what they want to do without projecting something onto them based of my values. So my viewpoint is openness.
Yours is the complete opposite. You project your values onto them. You are forcing something which doesn't affect you onto others. You want to control them.
Its like people who have a religion/believe say you also have to believe while i say i'm not allowed to push you into something like this.
And in my eyes this is not bad behavior at least not from the information i have. I would be concerned if and only if the kid would grow up without any parent.
240kWh per month, 35cent per kWh and a base price of 10 Euros.
Just because we conditioned ourselves like this, doesn't mean its right or wrong.
And this article doesn't give us enough insight to even judge.
Birth control is not perfect. 99% is very little in comparision to the amount of sex happening in a population of 8 billion people.
And lets be honest here: A single father is so rare that this alone raises eyebrows and questions. Ironically more like positive reactions and dismissive ones against the woman.
So in avg man earn more and have more carerse because they do not stay at home for the children.
Also guess who normally gets custody? Yeah the mother. So having a man getting custidy is not normal at all. This skews the data massivly.
So as long as we are not experts here but a group of men earning above avg, we might not stereotype and dismiss genders.
The chance this is completly fabricated though is very low and its an highly interesting signal to many others.
There was also a really good AI CTF Talk at 39c3 hacker conference just 4 month ago.
And no you are not allowed to shame other people for their decisions if its not clear that there is a kid getting abused in any way. People are adults and not yours to criticsize if it doesn't affect you or a 3th entity which can't protect itself.
Its your personal opionion you can easily and should keep yourself.
Btw. its also a lot harder for man to get the sole custody which means that only the most motivated and well suited men even achieve this probably also with an expensive lawyer.
Perhaps we fixup our society instead of blaming it to a woman?
And why do we evaluate this on something like hn?
Are you shaming a person for having sex or?
A theoretical random tweet and a clear demonstration are two different things.