mtl_usr
With programmable graphing calculator that's sorta possible. At least, I've done it a few times.
Alas, it was most often banned from exams because "I can't see what you have done there to get that answer".
Also, most of the class ended up using my program for a specific class of problems we had to do in maths. In retrospect, I probably caused some harm by getting my classmates to be that lazy during exams.
I guess they still do it on the enterprise level. But they have fallen behind in terms of consumer ecosystem.
Maybe I'm biased and a tad emotional. I was expecting more from Canada.
It's by James Whittaker. Basically people are downloading and using way less apps than a few years ago. Today to get the users to use something it has to be sortof built-in the ecosystem in an other way then simply forcing someone to go search for and download a specific app.
Passenger rating does matter when it comes to how fast you are getting your ride.
There are a lot of people with these qualifications.
There is a huge saturation of apps on every major platform and it's getting harder and harder for new devs to get enough userbase that way.
Also, the operation was lead by pretty much all of Canada's telcos. It's not an especially competitive market.
But let's be real for a moment, that man, if he sues, will get absolutely nothing in return.
Still, it's about time Canada starts getting real laws.
This and the people held hostage without AC or water in a plane for 5 hours+ is a proof at how backward this country really is.
It would use a very simple and systematic flowchart representation to model control flow. The great thing about it is that once you understood < > = (also taught in the class) the whole program could be readable.
I think I was the only one to read it and pretty much got the feeling it wasn't important as nobody, even the teacher, payed any attention to it.
Which makes them pretty bad, even worst for dieting.
Curious, how do you normally figure out the phosphorus content ? Is there a guideline somewhere that gives you an adequate estimate ?
I guess using an iPad could make the consumer feel safer. Than again a "Pro" looking case for the Android tablet might also do the trick.
I didn't think of that specific use-case (only one or two apps for the whole life-cycle of the unit).
I'm still curious to know if it would be cheaper to buy Android units anyways and replace them as their software becomes obsolete as compared to buying pricier iPads that will keep up longer with software updates. Just factoring the costs here, not the environmental impact obviously.
In general I noticed a shorter support period in the Android segment as compared to iOS (Excluding terrible cases such as OnePlus dropping support almost instantly).
I'm still waiting for an Android tablet that's as nice to use as an iPad.
I guess they are rich enough to waste their employee's time to save a few square feet.
Bad enough to change a whole business plan ?
> Shared libraries beyond that would bring the hell of version incompatibility. One need only look at Apple’s evolution of Swift where there still isn’t binary compatibility?
Since the source code is shared with Apple once it reaches the marketplace, wouldn't it be simpler for Apple to compile a specific version for whatever version of the Swift language is available on the target device ?
It wouldn't have any market value and wouldn't drive iOS devices sales but is would certainly slim them down a little.
> Also shared libraries can be giant security holes. See the bug in AFNetworking that affected many thousands of apps. Imagine an errant app shipping a backdoor into a shared networking library.
This sorta makes me like iOS a bit more. Memory gets cheaper but security doesn't get any cheaper when the dependencies grow.
Hope Europeans bankers will enjoy their new offices in Berlin, Amsterdam and Paris.
Other than the environment provided ones, isn't it possible to bundle some dynamically loaded libraries that can be shared by multiple apps ? Makes absolutely no sense for each application to implement it's own web browser/runtime.
Can't believe we are constantly reinventing the wheel again.
I will steal that explanation. Thanks !
The Bay Area is a pretty good current example of that future.
Not good when the website that hosts it relied on page view and ads to make a profit !
EDIT : National geographic isn't an offender for clickbait.
Of course, this will only give incentives to the company to further automate it's production facilities, at the expanse of the workers.
It's an excellent starting point.