mtkhaos

This throws out the possibility of high quality content.

But can help and be accelerated by such. As this has been the tune for a long time as things have been presented as being solved. A wild west is how you open back up marketplaces to solve these issues. Especially as those issues are fundamental towards handling a rapid rise of productivity/entropy. This is the challenge of now. And intelligence as a mechanism is an actionable route, versus waiting for people to change perspective. Especially as the question can be whether the current now is capable of even handling an increased amount of Entropy. In addition that rise of Productivity is Unavoidable.

You would be amazed at the amount of unsolved problems that Intelligence as a mechanism helps solve. Goals would still be abound as that is the Consequence of maintaining a highly entropic system. It would be more interesting bluntly.

But isn't a binary absolute in this case and cannot be used in the basis of first principle's assumption of truth.

By odds and in the context of RLHF the human could very well thumbs up the output without recognition of said hallucination.

As hallucination is a general term giving to said phenomenon. Otherwise the question Emerges why 2023? And why was that not known colloquially before hand. When the basis of these Algorithms come the the 80s?

Reading through there is a heavy fault in logic. Statically reasonable limitations to llm output based on training material, ignores hallucinations. And hallucinations ignore the sheer chance of new emergent information by odds.

It's not a broad brushstroke and specifically here am an autistic individual surviving neurodegeneration due to the increase of reeln funny enough.

This obviously isn't the place for said discussions.

Controversial take.

Autism isn't a disorder, but a mutation and in this instance can be correlated to the microbiome of the gut. But does not account for the increase in reeln nor changes in rna that cause increased sensitivity to stimuli. And is only treated as a disorder in respect to assembly line predetermined processes typical of today's organizations. That runs counter to the increased stimuli of maintaining said predetermined process, while punishing divergence.

This is also noting that data can be fit to suit a narrative and causation is different than correlation. But seem similar in the general context of today's discourse. And limited by predictability while noting the massive reproduction crisis in science such as this article and others. Including the recent controversy at Stanford with the president stepping down due to enabling the manipulation of data specifically in this domain of science.

The EU has a bill on the table that would make open source authors liable for patching bugs and exploits in commercial software.

If that bill goes through. This argument is nullified at the global scale. And it behooves open source authors to create licensing agreements Commercially.

Open Source simply means Open Source. Everything after the fact is up to the license and bad actors will always ignore such.

Threads like these make me realize how little foresight there is into the genuine creation of Frankenstein's Monster Situation.

Because you never learn the Monsters Name, nor was the Monster a Monster. Just Poof Here he is and there is a Mob with Torches. Rather than being seen in wonder and possibilities.

Not to mention at what Scale can we see one of these models in this Light? As Life enough for a Mob and Torches. Or how soon that will be. And who wants to be Frankenstein? As they remember his Name as the Monster's.

It's amazing goal orientation isn't fundamental

Logic is simple inline with reducing power draw from a simplistic instruction set.

Move into a space where we have rapid manufacturing for Specialized chips. Alongside the concept inherit to Nvidia's DPU and you have something very Interesting.

Appreciate how you dug into the text. It's the same rigor each site owner should be take to maintain a coherent work environment in this age.

Otherwise we will all just speak gobblygook nodding along while our tools do the job for us. Not my personal signage

I'm looking forward to seeing a Chiplet DPU similar to Nvidias offering. There is a lot room for growth especially for the professional market.

Cheers to an Open Simulation Testing Platform. No reason not to have each aspect of our knowledge base to be testable in an reasonable amount of time.

It's difficult as most of the risk can be reinterpreted as a highly advanced user.

But that is where some form of hard personhood zero proof mechanism NEEDS to come in. This can then be used in conjunction with a Ledger used to track deployment of high spec models. And create an easy means to Audit and deploy new advanced tests to ensure safety.

Really what everyone also need to keep in mind at the larger scale is that final turing test with no room for deniability. And remember all those Sci-fi movies and how that Moment is portrayed traditionally.

What's nice is considering a global audience.

Local Storage?

Cookies are just a Dumb Implementation and only persist due to advertising.

It's fun knowing what's on the otherside of the Derivative people are actively avoiding.

It would be nice if the Scientific community had the same rigor as a test driven development pipeline.

Strange world

This would be a terrible way to go as in moving increased consumerism and having that blur with religion would only serve to blur that line in media. We already live in a Post Truth world. Dillution, radicalization, and the clash between such cranked up to 12.

Not to say you cannot have such. But a system focused on education, community, and understanding. As a Foundational basis could support what you want and respect belief without the same teeth.

The mistake in this situation is not following the money. Whenever dealing with anticompetitive behavior, you also need to address the rules etc that allows it.

It's not a messaging issue. It's systemic.

Just throwing this out there as a neurodegenerative in remission. It's not the main reason why. But I can definitely tell when I haven't taken my Lion's mane caps that morning.

This after years of elimination, trial and error out the necessity survival. It's worth a human trial once we can actually measure the effects.

Could just plug it in. The main detractors from making this uneconomical in the US is the lack of consumer infrastructure for upload.

I'm letting this get buried. As I want to point out some contradictions

* This article neglects that we already in post truth and have been since 2016

* It also mentions it is never a good idea to train on your own data. And yet in post truth there is no such thing as good data unless it is verifiable that a user handed it over themselves. This is neglects the emergent field of using synthetic data on purpose.

What is going to be interesting and I hope pay attention to is that any criticism of Ai is a direct criticism of the norm and the fear of it's continuation accelerated. And yet we are already in the acent, so I would hope instead of expressing fears. We embrace solutions and talk about the future we want.

As no conversation can alter the path we are on now. So do you guys want the forever treadmill? Or UBi?

I prefer a functional inside out approach. Getting funding for it and start up soon, but you will own everything.

Issue is they reinvented the wheel in the crypto space. Centralized or decentralized it's all on the same market is only a matter of scale. As even in centralized markets the concept of edge is just hitting parity.

What really surprised me about the space was the refusing of not registering as a speculative asset. As even if you look into the regulations, it's merely making the mechanisms transparent and creating reporting.

As if DeFi followed through with the true promise of decentralization and transparency. The FTX situation would never have happened in the first place. So with that, the crypto space actually went against its principles and we are seeing the result.

Nice attempt and interesting workflow using a prompt based transformer. I would prefer being able to spawn a command palette and skip over the voice, alongside having the choice between different variations.

I feel as if you are using a fallacy in your analysis. As AI models are just decision trees in essence and it's the same with human inference. That there is no magic and it seems mundane is the point. As our reality is surprisingly simple and these new models for artists and programmers alike demonstrate such.

It's moving the goal post simply. As it is the same with Google's Chatbot that "fooled," their own engineer. Thus it becomes a chicken and egg situation as to when AI truly passes the turing test. In the same way putting on a VR headset and being fooled you are someplace else the first few times. Then once you are used to it, it becomes as if you are changing your reality just like putting on new glasses.

Human beings have a hard time with exponential. And my guess will be next year that we have AI generated video that is indistinguishable from a human production. It's just software sure, but so are we.

We live in a simulation in our own minds. Your eyes do not behave as cameras, but instead detect the bare minimum detail needed for your mind to recreate the world around you. When your first born you blind and one of your first achievements is learning to see.

It makes sense that what we see is a memory, as how else could we transfer not just the visual, but smells, feelings, etc... into our long term memory. Efficiency