mru
Re:Subversion to enable Git-like features
on Friday February 19, 2010 @08:26AM (#1136833)
Re:Subversion to enable Git-like features
on Friday February 19, 2010 @08:24AM (#1136825)
I guess you hadn't noticed that git has a very nice gui.
Re:Why Subversion is better than Git
on Wednesday February 10, 2010 @09:31AM (#1114879)
He seems to be saying that svn is better than git because _some_ git users have a central repository they work against, and because they are planning on adding some features that might to some extent allow them to mimic a few things git already can do. That's just about the weakest argument for svn over git I've ever heard.
Then the went on to use the word "enterprise" about 10 times in 30 seconds. Not convincing.
Re:The iPad CPU: Details on the Apple A4
on Monday February 01, 2010 @09:56PM (#1094141)
I read somewhere that the A4 has an ARM MALI graphics processor, not an SGX.
Re:Ask HN: Embedded Systems?
on Saturday January 30, 2010 @01:29PM (#1089018)
The Beagleboard has a very friendly and helpful community with mailing list and IRC channel. The Hawkboard is newer and as such doesn't have quite the same following, but you should have no trouble getting help with it either.
Re:Ask HN: Embedded Systems?
on Saturday January 30, 2010 @10:01AM (#1088702)
I would recommend getting a Beagleboard[1] or a Hawkboard[2], both low-cost single-board systems with somewhat differing capabilities.
Re:Walking Naked into the Embassy
on Saturday January 30, 2010 @08:37AM (#1088629)
Will they no longer keep restricted items at the guard station outside the embassy? It's a couple of years since last time I was there.
Re:Going back to C
on Tuesday January 26, 2010 @08:43PM (#1079518)
I think he means C doesn't require a framework or VM of monstrous proportions in order to do its thing.
Re:Geek behaviors present during conversations
on Tuesday January 26, 2010 @04:06PM (#1078861)
Amen to that.
Re:ARM Assembly Language Programming
on Sunday November 22, 2009 @04:59PM (#956265)
Qemu is pretty good, but ARMv7 emulation isn't quite complete yet. Anything compiled by gcc will probably run though.
Re:ARM Assembly Language Programming
on Sunday November 22, 2009 @06:21AM (#955644)
True, but there's nothing to say future implementations will not be faster. Adding more execution units is "easy". Fixing an instruction set is not.
Re:ARM Assembly Language Programming
on Saturday November 21, 2009 @02:43PM (#954844)
ARMv7 has a SIMD unit (NEON) that easily outshines SSE and Altivec. Floating point support is also good nowadays.
Re:ARM Assembly Language Programming
on Saturday November 21, 2009 @02:39PM (#954837)
ARM core sales are measured in billions per year.
Re:A Summary of the Great CRU Data Hack Emails
on Saturday November 21, 2009 @02:34PM (#954834)
That's the point. It's not science.
Re:Introducing Bad Code Offsets
on Wednesday November 18, 2009 @12:21PM (#948631)
Clever indeed. Does that mean I can offset my carbon emissions by buying some shares in a coal power station?
Re:Amex sends USB trojan keyboards in ads
on Tuesday November 10, 2009 @12:31PM (#933472)
In Win95/98 an autorun CD would defeat a password-locked screensaver. We had loads of fun with that...