mritun
Every single H1B I worked with was brilliant in their field - and paid extremely well often in excess of $400K. I know several that are earning well past $500K. If you claim these are generic Jira pushers, well you are showing ignorance.
The $100K fees isn’t material to them but the whole vitriolic nonsense poured around what they do and just rolling their work in mud - well that’s where they just move and take their 50 ppl organization with them.
This is pure nonsense.
Drag Music app to Trash, and that it! Like you do with any other app.
Weird take given Google basically invented and released through well written papers and open-source software the modern deep learning stack which all others build on.
Google was being disses because they failed to make any product and were increasingly looking like Kodak/Xerox one trick pony. It seems they have woken up from whatever slumber they were in
The money is in Chrome patents and copyright. One can go to town and blitzkrieg the NodeJS ecosystem which has super deep pockets. SCO will look baby-talk.
Here is me “thinking aloud”, I don’t have that kind of money to buy Chrome.
Assuming someone has the funds to buy Chrome, they will end up buying the IP and brand. The IP is copyright on the code which is mostly open source, proprietary Google services integration bits, and then the brand.
I can see value in buying the patents & copyright to the codebase and taking it private to build a proprietary State of the art browser to sell or bundle for free with Ads.
Nobody is going to pay for a browser in 2025 so Mritun’s Chrome (my brand - I can’t call it Google Chrome anymore) is going to be ad supported. I might have to think of paid V8 runtimes like Mritun’s Electron and Mritun’s NodeJS to extract maximum value from my investment.
All in, in these high interest-rate environment, I do not see someone buying Chrome to fund it for free - however a lot of ecosystems depend on Chrome, so the best bet would be to use copyright and patents to go after the users. If I have money, I can totally see buying Chrome for approx $100M and then going after monetization.
I am not a scientist but it of 32 faulty widgets, 28 widgets are made by a guy called Raoult, then even blue collar workers know Raoult is an idiot with no business making widgets. If that does not happen, ACME Widgets will eventually go out of business.
This is how science gets discredited - by allowing idiots do “science”. Here Raoult does not get kicked out, but is Director of the ACME - this is how entire field of medicine research gor tainted.
Greed is universal. Slavery is one of the outcomes.
Record the seed for all RNGs used (if you’re using more than one for your SkipList implementation) and then your Skip lists are no more harder to debug than a linked-list.
https://github.com/Wren6991/PicoDVI
The GPIO on RPi is not very useful for precision work and you’re limited to using SPI (usually to talk to an auxiliary microcontroller). The GPIO on RP2040 is so good that you can use it as 24 channel 100Msps logic analyzer in a pinch.
edit: Emulators, of course!
… and dead people tell no tales. They can’t warn others against ineffective treatments and the preventive measures that they would love to have access to.
OP, the tech exists however contrary to expectations, to have multiple displays attached with a bandwidth constrained connection, the display tends to have all the special bits in it (contrast it with your “please stop having displays be 'special”)
To support no bits moving when image is static, the display must incorporate a framebuffer and once you add franebuffer to the display, it stops being a dumb display. Eg. You can add smarts to it and expose higher level primitives for “display acceleration” and reduce the bandwidth required further… and very quickly the display is just a computer with memory and video accelerator (aka graphics card) connected with a cable.
This is what RDP. Xdisplay and VNC accomplish. The basic complexity is not reduced but moved elsewhere. However the function gained is very useful so they exist and it’s a competitive landscape!
“It was just a joke” smh
“ In various conversations, the Quigleys refer to attaching images of oven doors to the Aronsons' house, of burning their children and of wishing their Jewish neighbors had been blown up in a terrorist attack in Israel.”
Money begets money!
The foremost benefit of Cedar is that the implementation is formally proven. Which means that you are extremely unlikely to have to deal with unexpected behavior! Of course, the modeling needs to be reviewed manually for completeness, but the verifier can tell if the model is buggy or inconsistent.
nb. In tunnels, the smoke kills.
CarPlay and AndroidAuto protocols basically treat car’s display as a remote framebuffer.
EU (and India) are fundamentally trying to strengthen their local economies and severe their dependence on US based entities. I could disagree but I think it’s really important to understand that these are sovereign nations with dedicated think tanks.
Policy decisions like this are debated and then enacted. It would not be surprising if the coverage of Open Source software repositories is not accidental, but actually a very well thought nuance because truth is that nearly all big Open Source entities are US based! In the eyes of the policy makers, The “big tech problem” may not be limited to commercial for-profit entities and arguably more relevant to open-source which is where EU is betting it’s future on.
However absurd it may seem to a open source activist, it may not seem absurd for a policy maker to consider that open source stewardship should have an independent EU chapter as well that answers to EU policy and abides by the local laws. It may not happen on day 1, but policymakers of such wide ranging laws like the Digital Markets act, think more in decades, than years.
TL;DR - Interesting interpretation is that Digital Market act purposefully covers all “big tech players” - commercial or open source. In the eyes of EU policy makers Mozilla, Apache and Debian foundations could very well be as “US controlled” and “strategically important” as commercial entities!
(disclaimer: I work for a large corporation, but this comment is my own 1am thought!)