News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

mrgn

Re:How Much Does It Cost to Clone Your Favorite App? on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @01:57AM (#10077779)
Another app & site pricing resource also from a designer/developer-for-hire service is http://howmuchtomakeanapp.com/ Upon cursory use their estimates seem to be much higher than Gigster's, which could be a valuable thing to show potential clients come quoting time.
Re:Vellum on Monday July 07, 2014 @06:10PM (#8001850)
Five minutes later it's still retrieving my reading list (tried with and without AdBlock). I'm very happy using Nuzzel, which seem to do the exact same thing.
... Using wifi in airplane mode is a great way to save battery life or prevent calls while using wi-fi. I do this all the time. You can try it yourself (just turn on airplane mode, then turn on wifi) or read more from Apple: http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1355

It seems in worrying about wifi, you missed the point of the exhibits submitted, though. You can read the rest of those here: http://www.rezlaw.com/News-Events/06-30-14_Complaint_with_Ex...

Re:Things You Love are Made with Code on Friday June 20, 2014 @03:37PM (#7922461)
For that to make sense you'd really have to believe that the US will need fewer, not more, STEM jobs in the future. The vast majority of educated STEM workers and engineers are completely removed from venture-funded Silicon Valley startups and any potential 'tech bubble.'
Re:Things You Love are Made with Code on Friday June 20, 2014 @03:27PM (#7922405)
Perhaps you didn't read closely, but the fact that computer engineering is a well-paid profession is only a result of its demand, influence and importance to the future economy. Devoting equal time and resources encouraging people to abandon higher education in order to pursue unskilled labor may sound like "equality" to you, but hardly seems like a sound strategy for the economy or any industry.
Re:Things You Love are Made with Code on Friday June 20, 2014 @03:04PM (#7922281)
Diversity isn't a zero sum game. STEM is one of the fastest growing professional fields, meaning more people--of any gender--will need to fill those jobs.

The goal is gender balance, there's no need to fear that a woman or a person of color accepting a newly created STEM job will somehow push a white man out of his existing position. Let's be realistic here.

Re:Things You Love are Made with Code on Friday June 20, 2014 @03:00PM (#7922251)
No, and the answer why should be blindingly obvious to any intelligent person: computer engineering (as opposed to your chosen examples of truck driving childcare, and auto repair) is among the most well-paid, economically influential, and entrepreneurial profession today, and will become increasingly so in the future. Gender and race representation is simply of less concern for less aspirational, lower-paid professions that do not require extensive education or access to technical resources.
Re:An open letter on feminism in tech on Thursday May 22, 2014 @03:55PM (#7786058)
Comparing the relative severity of any injustice or crime doesn't help solve it.
Re:An open letter on feminism in tech on Thursday May 22, 2014 @03:48PM (#7786014)
This uphill battle is becoming easier and easier, as evidenced by how many men are coming forward here to share their experiences and support. If you feel chastised, it's likely because, in the face of an overwhelming amount of data and evidence, your statements read in the vein of incredulity and dismissiveness rather than 'concern' and 'understanding.'
Re:Quora in the next YC batch on Friday May 09, 2014 @06:51PM (#7723678)
Quora would have to be having an extremely difficult time hiring for it to be a recruiting move. A Venn diagram of engineers or designers for whom Quora is more interesting when affiliated with Y Combinator, whom Quora would also want to hire, but who could not already join most other Y Combinator startups does not overlap.
Toptal is moderating and deleting any comments that aren't in support of their twisted publicity stunt, but here's my open letter to their CEO.

Taso,

Your vociferous moral crusade against LinkedIn has highlighted a few equally disturbing issues with Toptal. Trusting everything you've written here, I'm hoping you can explain why Toptal operates antithetically to your claims of defending female engineers and "regular professional women."

First, your site raises question -- what women?

- Toptal's homepage features 10 images of its tech professionals. Not just engineers, but specific titles like Django Developer and Security Specialist. 0 are women.

- Toptal's team page features 9 employes and investors. 0 are women.

- Toptal's blog features photos of its 10 latest post authors. 0 are women.

- Toptal's 2-minute homepage video features "clients like Mark and developers like Andrew," and cartoons of characters dressed in everything from business to scuba suits. I counted over two dozen of them, but let's say 21. 0 are women.

Out of 50 -- FIFTY -- featured Toptal employees, investors, engineers, developers, specialists, clients, bloggers and candidates... 0 are women.

Professional women are just as offended when tech companies sex-up their images to promote their products as they are when their images are excluded all together. Between Toptal's ads and website, women are either 1). as attractive as professional models, or 2). don't exist at all.

Second, why should we believe you?

Searching toptal.com for any support for female technologists, or even a mention of women, woman, female, girl, diversity, etc. reveals 0 results prior to this post. In fact, Toptal's only discussion of women is in a blog post you wrote about how Toptal built "The Ultimate Remote Culture" by organizing a four week long company trip to Thailand. Not only are there no women, but you publicly label your employees' female partners "The Problems" and shamed one employee for returning to his family after two weeks away. I'll let your views speak for themselves below:

"The Problems The second problem almost brought the trip to a halt. Actually, this particular problem can often bring the whole world to a halt. What could it be? Any guesses?

Girlfriends. Or wives, in some cases. That’s right. Most of the girlfriends (especially the Russian ones) were not okay with their significant other going away for more than two weeks, much less four. One of our engineers (whose name will go unspoken) was such a victim, and could only stay for the first half of the trip. Pretty much every single attendee asked if they could bring their girlfriend/wife for at least a week. But, alas, this was a company event, and the answer was no. Everyone acquiesced and, in the end, the biggest hurdle was surmounted." http://www.toptal.com/remote/the-ultimate-remote-culture

If this is how Toptal feels about women, it seems the only thing we need defense from, is you.

Re:Union Square gets 5,000% return on Tumblr on Tuesday May 21, 2013 @07:53PM (#5747899)
A cursory Googling reveals PrivCo and CEO Sam Hamadeh will say just about anything for an apropos headline.
...except that startups are businesses with fiduciary responsibilities to their investors and shareholders and a legal obligation to obey employment law including not committing or tolerating gender discrimination, harassment, or a hostile work environment.
Probably a dozen people walked out of this SXSW presentation before I did (no more than 15 minutes in), I assure you they didn't find it acceptable.
completely agree with you and anichan.
I disagree. I have a pretty thick skin and was one of the many people who walked out of this SXSW talk early. It was low on useful content which made it easier to leave; but the repeated mentions of 'hot chicks' 'gang bang approach' 'nudie mags' and 'babes' just grossed me out.
Re:Andreessen Horowitz to give half their earnings to charity on Wednesday April 25, 2012 @10:27PM (#3892083)
This makes me (even more) happy to work for an a16z portfolio company. Though in a long-term and indirect way, more of the product of my work will go toward a great cause.
Re:Quick Salary Tip for Software Engineers on Friday January 06, 2012 @04:28PM (#3435121)
Agreed. I'd recommend against this every time, unless you are 100% prepared for the inconvenience and potential penalties of an audit. It's just not worth it.
Re:Are you a Facebook employee? on Friday August 05, 2011 @02:47PM (#2851208)
I'm 2305451 and I registered in November 2004 (I remember this because join date used to be prominently listed on all profiles)

homepage screenshot: http://bit.ly/q5P4kQ

Re:Vayable Is A Marketplace For Unique Travel Experiences on Friday April 22, 2011 @08:43PM (#2475932)
AirBnB's first acquisition? Seriously though, this is my new list of San Francisco date ideas: http://www.vayable.com/bay_area
Re:Vayable Is A Marketplace For Unique Travel Experiences on Friday April 22, 2011 @08:20PM (#2475892)
Seriously good name. Was it unregistered? I'm nosy.