News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

mraleman

I bet the vast majority of the devs complaining in here hate supporting old versions. Or are web devs.
Sounds like a good way to read average articles and reinforce a filter bubble, click bait titles, and bike-shedding.
Re:Awesome C++ – find the best libraries on Friday June 10, 2016 @02:11PM (#11878541)
Not only that, but JSON library perf is hilariously variable.
Re:Why is a Rust executable large? on Thursday June 02, 2016 @06:09PM (#11826505)
> Just to be cautious: Is it a valid question to ask after all? We have hundreds of gigabytes of storage, if not some terabytes, and people should be using decent ISPs nowadays, so the binary size should not be a concern, right?

Phones? IoT? Embedded? OS devs? Someone just checked in a 14KB binary size reduction to our shell (by removing unnecessarily virtual methods in some C++) that was widely celebrated.

Also, smaller .dll's load faster from disk.