more-nitor
hmm have you seen stabby maniacs and drug addicts in "healthcare provided countries"?
does having healthcare make those people visit those "providers" and go:
"Hello! I'm a maniac with mental issues/drug problems, and I'm visiting you to be treated! good day!"
with this stupidity, maybe you should try eating list of 20 deadly plants and see how it goes?
"ownership" means "edible/nose-able"... maybe you should try eating your car?
I mean, we name viruses & bacterias by their category/shape/etc, so shouldn't we do something similar to inflammation? eg. blue, vege-inflammation, red inflammation, pink-diamond-shaped inflammation inflammation-from-burn, etc?
this.
even though some Israel's actions are spooky (targeted-exploding walkytalkies?), they're at least designed to minimize civilian deaths (or at least they're trying)
But... Iran and their ilks (eg. Hamas)? they not only don't give a shit, but actively seek to kill civilians with maximum brutality (baby beheadings, killing & parading even with non-israeli bodies)
seriously?
definitely a smell of some dirty play going on here
"this company is from israel (so must be mosad)" or "has notorious for its questionable practices" (without even giving actual examples or incidents)?
I mean, if you're the mosad guy making a deal with samsung, why would you even make it appear to the user?
this is a classic competitor-bashing article -- no substance, only hand-wavy "this guys bad!"
"non-profit" doesn't make "smex" the morally-right side of the game. it just means they don't pay taxes and receive donations...
maybe it's time to trace where those donation money comes from? smells like competitors (xiaomi, huawei) who wants to take a cut from samsung?
it just means that they don't pay taxes
I mean, if I was the mosad guy planting a deal with samsung, I wouldn't even name the app "AppCloud"
heck, why would you even make it appear to the user?
this is a classic competitor-bashing article -- no substance, only hand-wavy "this guys bad!"
I'm guessing this can be traced to others like xiami/huawei/etc who definitely want to get samsung's slice of the market there
people expect LLMs to say "correct" stuff on the first attempt, not 10000 attempts.
Yet, these people are perfectly OK with cherry-picked success stories on youtube + advertisements, while being extremely vehement about this simple experiment...
...well maybe these people rode the LLM hype-train too early, and are desperate to defend LLMs lest their investment go poof?
obligatory hype-graph classic: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Ga...
> (I'm hoping someone would) create `with_err` function: some_mayerr_func().with_err_log()
> (I'm hoping someone would) add 'newbie beginner mode(default)' / 'expert mode (optimized)' for rust
about: Adding an invisible, inaccessible, always-implicitly-initialized field sounds too weird and non-Rusty to me
maybe rust-devs are too focused on "zero-cost abstraction"? I mean, if I'm building for embedded sys, I have to make sure I don't waste any ram... but for other cases like web-server dev, it's much better to have some-cost abstraction that helps debugging
(this might actually be one of the reason rust isn't used a lot despite having an extremely good language basis/growth -- other one being async cancellation...)
1. create `with_err` function: some_mayerr_func().with_err_log()?
2. add 'newbie beginner mode(default)' / 'expert mode (optimized)' for rust:
- current Rust default is a bit too focused on code-optimization, too much so that it defaults to removing backtrace
- default should be 'show every backtrace even for handled errors (in my code, not the lib code -- bonus points for "is handled" checkbox)'
if someone's bringing "google payscale" for comparison... well that's not some average joe...
why not just bring Bill Gates and say "everything -- including private jet -- is dirt cheap" ?
$8k per year simply doesn't make sense for 95% of the programmers. For a lot of developing countries, that's more than a well-paying programmer's annual salary...
if a TV seller went bonkers and only said "it's 10:16", can you guess the actual size of that TV?
...maybe your "law" is some ancient eye-for-eye kind of law instead of some modern stuff?
it's like:
"does apple cure cancer in monkeys?" vs "does blueberry cure diabetes in pigs?"
some credit card companies have botched chatbot process: "lost/forged credit card report" / "talk-to-person" are essential support process, but they require you to enter your PIN to get thru that process
(if the request for a new credit-card is faked, you're out of luck)
1. employment-rate for Americans. 2. bringing back industrial capacity in US.
If large companies are forced to recycle/repair INSIDE USA, that ultimately means employment for Americans, and bringing back industrial capacity back to US.
(which could mean forcing Chinese manufacturers settings up whole industrial complexes in US...)
btw, this would be a much easier/lesser-side-effect measure than "tariff on everyone" situation
Arrange a political debate right after a diplomatic tour, with huge jet-legs sleep loss?
free-trans-surgery with tax payer money?
no wonder that man went "fck this"
I just wonder if democrats simply gave up on the last election
I mean, it seems like saying copper/iron/titanium/lead are all "metal"
I mean, shouldn't different plastics (PE, PP, etc) have different effects?
this. some smart asses would be calling all their relatives, distant-relatives, friends, etc AND claim that they all lived there. then, share the loot(?) like 50%, 30%, 20% etc
the more better approach would be compensating by property, though does have its own downsides
I mean, what you think is "something new" is most likely to be something already discussed somewhere in the internet.
also, humans (including postdocs and professors) don't use THAT much data + watts for "training" to get "intelligent reasoning"
your evidence: "it works with these inputs I tried!"
...hmm seems you're not quite versed in basic mathematical proofs?
"I made a hypothesis that works with 1 to 5. if a hypothesis holds for 10 numbers, it holds for all numbers"
you have to see ruby's popularity to see whether "it's despite or because of"
it's not just a matter of preference -- "no-curly-brace" dogma means it's impossible to do multiline lambdas in python
then we can know if something is affected by the full shutdown