moqalib

The article completely drops the ball on the Xbox. The XBox is Microsoft at it's best and it shows. I understand trying to prove a point, but lets not be disingenuous.

It feels like Microsoft is 1 winning product away from turning the tide, or 1 loosing product from sealing it's irrelevance. I can't help but think how this article would've been written if Windows Phone 7 turns out to be a huge success 2 years from now. It's easy to paint a gloomy picture.

The only trouble I see for Microsoft, is one where they are not seen as a leader. One where reactionary product after reactionary product renders them as a technology company seen by the outside world as chasing technology and not laying it's bricks.

As long as features can be simulated adoption will stagnate. As much as we like to think we (the developers) are in control of browser adoption, the simple reality is that we're not. The end users are. The "normals". They don't give a shit if your box-shadow uses a PNG or is implemented using CSS3. They don't know the difference between canvas and flash. Hey! it works right?

I honestly believe that the way to move the web forward is by letting browsers innovate at the expense of standards, and for developers to adopt non-aesthetic API's that will cause functional differences from the stagnating dominant incumbent if there is one at the time (at the moment IE).

In other words, when developers get pissed, they find solutions. When end users get pissed, the switch browsers, or decide your app is not worth it. Our goal is to get that proposition in front of end users as often as possible, and create enough value that they choose the former.

Mr. Macedo speaks perfectly comprehensible English. I understood every single word he uttered. Your comment is unnecessary and hurtful. What would be a "great idea" is if you added value somewhere instead of putting people down.

Mr. Macedo keep up the great job!