mkatx

That, and more commits means more data they can clean and train on, whether they're good or not. I'm sure they are commit-maxing and using AI as much as possible since they own that data and can use it however they want.

But I'd think at that point there'd be arguments for using that vps to instead facilitate a p2p connection... right?

I wonder if wfh creates any loopholes here, and they just select areas where there are no real candidate pools.

Does anything else support Pascal gpu's though?

Nice, a lot of fun!

And the enumeration via fuzzing leads to reverse engineering.. so I argue it was a pretty smart path, both short term and long term.

> Snowden 2.0

"NSA ... AI Models"

Definitely noticed this before, but this parti6 time was very noticeable. I'm convinced it's to get the benchmarks in, then lower cost and prepare for the next release to look better relatively to users.

I always wondered if some uses of the word 'and' I notice on occasion might have similar explanations, or if they were the result of misspelling, mistyping, incorrect autocorrect, etc.. anyone know?

Examples from published articles: "Barely half and hour was on the clock" "the hospital, which is in and area of central Homs" "spiraled into and armed uprising and civil war" "During and interview with ABC in July"

This is the way to go! Cut the cat and mouse, win win ish.

You don't think they used their own AI, or Claude, to help build the sandbox, and that is where the failure lies?

Yep. Reading some of the earliest written stories really shows how little we have changed socially since then, and I imagine that goes back a lot further.

I would say, try without thinking on. I find reasoning on any rag type request seems to increase hallucinations, probably due to the thinking tokens taking attention away from the, in this case, vision tokens.

I'd recommend non-thinking for any non-prompt input, and leave the thinking where it has to actually reason.

Nice! I haven't tried Merlin, but I been meaning to set it up in the yard.

I've been using Seek on my phone, which is part of inatural. Similar thing, but pictures and most life, not just birds. That is totally Pokemon for non-pokemon peeps.. gotta bust out my phone every time I find something I haven't 'caught' yet.

Their rate limits are incredibly generous..

Edit: spelling

Just did a quick search.. dunno the vid quality, but the point being "'I Remove This Mysterious Tiny Chip Before Using The Phone!' Edward Snowden"

https://www.bitchute.com/video/QqQmHy6aqlLe/

I'm not sure how realistic this is, but conversations like this always remind me of this procedure.

Edit: maybe should have responded to the OP directly.

So instead of reverse engineering.. an llm/agent/whatever could simply produce custom apps for everyone, simply implementing the features an individual might want. A more viable path?

Damn.. I just learned about this.

Aw shit.

*drawing-board

Look into something like flexwatt tape. Maybe run it during the day when your not sleeping. In my mind, they probably use something similar inside heated blankets with some kind of limiter/thermostat.

Do your research though!! I'm not sure if flexwatt tape could ignite your mattress, but you would definitely want to know for sure yourself beforehand!

There are ways to control heat though; I'm familiar with using flexwatt tape with reptile enclosures, hooked up to a thermostat with a probe in the habitat for temp control. Maybe some math, like desired_temp = watts_supplied * feet_of_fw_tape, where the watts_supplied is the independent variable you adjust based on the required feet_of_fw_tape for your mattress to get the dependent variable desired_temp. Probably include a fail safe, but I'm no electrician, proceed at your own risk.

They do sell self contained fire extinguishers you can hang on your ceiling that deploy automatically at a certain temperature, ideally putting out fire sources they are hung above. Nice to have around for things like this.

I do agree that changing policy is a separate, yet complimentary, step. But maybe the poor are disproportionately audited because the IRS doesn't have the funding to effectively target the rich and succeed? Maybe with better funding, they could successfully extract more tax dollars from the rich, incearsing the ROI of funding the agency?

I don't think further funding the agency is a completely nutty idea. Although if you truly believe the agency is broken, and that being broken isn't related to their funding, then I could understand your perspective. I lean more towards the idea that at least some, maybe even most, of the issues they have might be due to a lack of funding. That makes more sense to me than most of the criticisms I've heard of the IRS, which seem to mostly be on partisan idealism framed as otherwise.

You mean public, documented API's? Everything is/has an API.

Yeah. My favorite professor this semester constantly says "hey, if you rely to much on the robot, and can't do this yourself, you won't get a job." I know some people are just here for the paper, but that makes me feel better when I'm having a hard time finding a new role..

I feel the same way about monetizing my api reverse engineering skills. I taught myself to program by reverse engineering api's, and it's what led me to pursue computer science. I'm pretty good at it, but I can't seem to find a role to flex my skills.

This is one big point I've subscribed to, I'd rather write the code and understand it that way, than read and try to understand code I did not write.

Also, I think it would be faster to write my own than try to fully understand others (LLM) code. I have developed my own ways of ensuring certain aspects of the code, like security, organization, and speed. Trying to knead out how those things are addressed in code I didn't write takes me longer.

Edit; spelling

Yeah, as a cs student, some professors allow use of LLM's because it is what will be a part of the job going forward. I get that, and I use them for learning, as opposed to internet searches, but I still manually write my code and fully understand it, cause I don't wanna miss out on those lessons. Otherwise I might not be able to verify an LLM's output.

Can confirm, 100% Texas right there. It is still worse for non-white men though, but even that won't save you here.

I see that, yes. But they will still create legislation against those means.

Wait, the ones who are getting a great deal on labor costs are the ones complaining about the source of that great deal?

I'm not so sure..

So where do you sign up to be part of the "select external audiences access to Orion"?