mittensc
Right now it has 80s delorean look... That was nice then but a bit out of place now especially for a supercar
It is useful?, it works most of the time?
> This is objectively a good change because it will improve the quality of the code in the long term.
It depends?, sure, banning hit-and-run massive AI generated PRs will help.
These were problems before AI too, people just want to get their name on things without putting in effort.
This also bans possibly high quality PRs that fix things or add something new.
Either way, we'll see, anyone can still fork and if it's a better project then that will win over
What's the worse that can happen?
> Dean Scott chimed in, suggesting the streak was gas left behind by the Super Heavy booster as its engines shut down after separation and fired again for the return burn.
So why setup and share a clickbait article?
How well do you think a draft is going to go? forced on an armed populace that might not want to die in iran?
Could doesn't reopen hormuz.
Would NATO change the equation?
The US can't even win a war in the middle east without NATO
What is the US going to do when China starts making their own moves?
What would you respond?
would you say the same?
Don't like it, don't do genocide or dont visit its member countries.
If their statement is to be believed and they truly slow down, that means they are afraid of something. Otherwise some of them would just betray the rest.
If that is the case, then... why? what are they afraid of?
I would wager that failure, having their companies go bankrupt might be it.
How that would happen, I have no clue... I would assume interest rates raised because we're out of options dealing with inflation would hit their ability to raise money and once that happens they're in trouble...
"we're going to slow down AI" - why?
"we care about the masses and ..." - why? why now? what changed?
I'm a bit afraid that the actual reasons are economic, they may be realizing the hole they've dug themselves in with their massive investments with a recession that seems to be brought on by their tech....
Aparently that means: "give any AI system nearly unlimited access to a user’s device, as well as the ability to act on that access autonomously without a user’s ongoing visibility and control. That includes the ability to read and send messages, make purchases, access files, and execute actions across any app. Security researchers have already shown that AI systems can be hijacked to steal personal data — like passwords and photos — and to permanently alter files and account settings without a user’s consent. "
So... Siri can already do all that... how come Apple isn't concerned about that?
Perhaps a better approach is to allow users to control what AI agents can do including Siri and give all the same access through the same controls.
Would that be ok in your mind?
Same as someone going and taking all of the researchers papers and publishing under their own name. (which openAI did)
Nobody would care if they provided published research that author made public same as a google search would offer that.
why breathe in the fumes or have them get into your eyes?
or dont do anything and direct debit by default doesnt work
That's mostly because a phone is very locked down, can you run an accessible ftp server on your phone?
It's also not windows
You could share things easily, sure, but anyone could get hacked pretty easily and very targetted.
After NAT, sharing was still easy lots of 'piracy' apps, various messengers with NAT passthrough
Both before and after you needed to be technical, you can't ask someone that doesnt know about computers to set up an FTP server, and if they did it would be a nightmare and they'd likely share their whole drive
Same goes for anything else.
Anyway, we'll get the whole non-nat with IPv6, let's see what that brings
Perhaps other banks don't do this and that is the problem.
How does that even work?