minorninth
A site that genuinely responds quickly is best. But for a slow site, I'd always prefer one that at least gives me instant feedback that I clicked something over one that doesn't.
Basically a lot of that email was subject to litigation holds. If that litigation ends up depending on some email that Chase was supposed to retain but failed to, the judge is allowed to give a "spoliation inference" instruction to the jury - the jury can infer that the evidence would have been unfavorable to Chase.
The fact that this may have been due to incompetence rather than malice means this is less likely.
That doesn't sound like a bad deal to me. They're not taking away anything from free mode.
Keep in mind this is a little different than other social networks - there isn't a single centralized server so if you hit the software on a server that's underpowered or not configured properly, you'll get a very different experience.
https://www.postgresql.org/about/sponsors/
Also, I think it's important to note that a lot of contributors aren't volunteering their "free time", they're being paid by some other employer to contribute to PostgreSQL as part of their job:
https://www.enterprisedb.com/blog/importance-of-giving-back-...