mglikesbikes

Agree. Was really hoping for a Fitbit style band this year that just has a Siri button and Apple Pay. An iPod for your wrist perhaps.

Organizationally, Apple have definitely stuffed the Mac. Catalyst was a mistake and with hindsight they should have just made SwiftUI more capable, earlier. But now they’re focusing on building Android apps with it too?! To say nothing of locker service etc.

How many have used the new iOS daily since it was announced?

Gentle reminder that the average Mac user is nontechnical, especially the younger generation. IMO this is Apple slapping a formalized paint on the simplification of iOS 7, and doubling down on iconography (not app icons).

Now all of that said — there are major usability concerns in iOS 26 and the liquid glass design language. The file picker’s previous “Done” has been replaced with a single checkmark. Significant meaning is lost in a few places, and there are super-odd double-X icons (in mobile safari while entering a URL, for example). Safari’s new tab button is now out of reach, while the previous new tab gesture is now new tab group. Context menus expand now, instead of swipe, meaning what used to feel more natural now takes extra taps/muscle memory updates.

That all said, as iOS 7 improved over time and was nailed down, so will this.

To me it’s given the iPhone - an incredibly boring platform/device 18 years in - new life. The new Lock Screen Photo Shuffle is incredibly personable and downright beautiful. From my understanding, a lot of work went into pre-composing app icons, many of which are objectively beautiful.

I’ve found users can’t find buttons “under the thumb” so I’m curious how the dedicated tab bar search will work in practice.

Overall I think for the goals of liquid glass as a design system, it’s something only Apple could do - in a good way.

Svelte 5 reimagines the reactivity features (“runes”) and gets rid of the foot-guns, I know exactly what you’re referring to with state management. V5 is much more straightforward to both reason about and bug fix.

That’s so funny — my social network[1] was paid, too! People hated that shit but — this was when Twitter had just started dying. Maybe there’s more appetite for sustainable alternatives now. I certainly see lots of projects in process on TikTok.

“The tyranny of react” is spot on. React single-handedly killed my passion for web development, but Svelte brought me back.

Good luck!

1. https://pocketrides.com

gave me k10k vibes

This is exactly why I read HN! So cool. And a fellow Svelte lover. 10/10.

Good luck with the social network! It’s brutal out there..

PS — would be so cool to see a tailwind plugin of this (which in v4 should be just copying the vars in.. I didn’t look at the repo super closely). Great shit!

linking Curtis Yarvin[1] on a thread discussing a nazi salute is really something.

1. https://youtu.be/mYrPNvVhKLU

The case for this not being flagged: this is an intellectually curious forum and the mods have a proven ability to adequately moderate other contentious threads and allow politically-charged posts.

If what Pres. Biden said about a growing oligarchy holds true, more posts like this should be expected in the future (especially given the attendees from the tech sector at today’s inauguration), and it’s far better to have a trustworthy place to discuss these types of stories, given HN’s readership, than places like BlueSky or Reddit (read: content optimized for algorithms); the amount of intellect here could lead to positive outcomes. Additionally, given the amount of industrywide impact the actions of CEOs have, and a large percentage of us are founders, it would be more valuable than not to have the discussion.

So to the mods: please consider updating the site’s ToS to allow posts and discussions like this. It’s valuable to have these discussions, and quasi-favoritism like allowing pg’s DEI screed while flagging this, shows clear editorial bias.

I handled the “real human” problem by charging access to the platform (and doing something socially responsible with the profits). Saw recently that X is starting to do this for signups, which feels icky (and likely explains why my idea didn’t take off).

I agree with this, and it’s not hard to imagine a line between “national security risk” and the proliferation of communist/socialist-leaning content on the platform, especially by Americans. USA has such a long history of shutting down any conversation on the topic, and seeing 100k+ likes on a “mutual aid” video or similar likely rankles congresspeople.

I think all the pro-Palestine content was what pushed it over the top, but I’m not 100% sure on the timeline given Trump started the conversation in 2020 and is now poised to win political points by saving the day.

All around a total mess, and a big loss for free speech.

Jesus.

This is just so good. Congrats!

Some evidence of why not to bother:

1. Tar Pit Ideas: https://youtu.be/GMIawSAygO4

2. Tar Pit Ideas, the Sequel: https://youtu.be/GU9iT7MW0rs

Exactly. Privacy-first networks (like OP using WhatsApp) already exist and are in use and are $FREE.

Hi, I built one of these a few years ago. Poured my life savings into it.

You’re about to get a very tough education on who uses social networks and why they do it. It has nothing to do with privacy. Would urge you to not bother.

That’s the dream

What are you doing after quitting full stack web dev?

Off topic, but what do you use for your reading list?

If the US was an organism, what role would an under-educated X% play?

You say it’s a “cost” but equal education obviously isn’t a priority in our country and I can’t help but wonder who benefits from such a high percentage of illiteracy (this is semi-rhetorical).

I genuinely don’t think we’re tracking the cost appropriately nor implementing solutions with enough urgency; 10-15 years down the road this empire of ours is going to be far out-classed intellectually by countries that actually implement policy for the equitable benefit of everyone.

If I’m off base I’d appreciate an education on this topic as it’s quite gross to think about our elite institutions being proponents of eugenics in the past[1] and how that likely spilled over into the world-building we did after WWII (Kissinger etc).

Or put another way, how do we map “AI is going to save everyone” rhetoric to how history has actually gone, and what incentive do existing power structures have to change?

[1] https://youtu.be/FkKPsLxgpuY?t=1095